The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effector CD4+ and CD8+ T‐cell mechanisms in the control of respiratory virus infections
Abstract
Summary: The rules for T‐cell‐mediated control of viruses that infect via the respiratory mucosae show both common themes and differences depending on the nature of the pathogen. Virus‐specific CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are the key effectors of virus clearance in mice infected with both negative strand RNA viruses (influenza and Sendai) and a DNA virus, the murine γ‐herpesvirus68 (MHV‐68). Recently completed experiments establish that these activated CD8+ T cells indeed operate primarily via contact‐dependent lysis, Perform‐mediated cytotoxicity seems to be the preferred mode, though a Fas‐based mechanism can apparently serve as an alternative mechanism. Immune CD4+ T cells functioning in the absence of the CD8+ subset cannot eliminate MHV‐68 from lung epithelial cells, are somewhat less efficient than the CD8+ CTLs at clearing the RNA viruses, and are generally ineffectual in mice that lack B lymphocytes. Though cytokine secretion by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the virus‐infected king may promote both T‐cell extravasation and macrophage activation, such processes are not alone sufficient to deal consistently with any d these infections. However, CD4+ T help is mandatory for an effective B‐cell response, and can operate lo promote the clonal expansion of virus‐specific CD8+ T cells in the lymph nodes and spleen. Furthermore, a concurrent CD4+ T‐cell response seems to be essential for maintaining continued CD8+ T‐cell surveillance and effector capacity through the persistent, latent phase of MHV‐68 infection in B cells. Thus, the evidence to date supports a very traditional view: CD8+ T cells function mainly as killers and the CD4+ T cells as helpers in these respiratory virus infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
T Cell Responses Are Better Correlates of Vaccine Protection in the Elderly
McElhaney, J. E., Xie, D., Hager, W. D., Barry, M. B., Wang, Y., Kleppinger, A., Ewen, C., Kane, K. P., & Bleackley, R. C. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.6333 · Cited by 561
Brown, D. M., Dilzer, A. M., Meents, D. L., & Swain, S. L. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.2888 · Cited by 282
Deng, Y., Jing, Y., Campbell, A. E., & Gravenstein, S. (2004) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.172.6.3437 · Cited by 230
Rituximab-treated patients have a poor response to influenza vaccination
Eisenberg, R. A., Jawad, A. F., Boyer, J., Maurer, K., McDonald, K., Prak, E. T. L., & Sullivan, K. E. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1007/s10875-012-9813-x · Cited by 126
Cellular immunity and memory to respiratory virus infections
Woodland, D. L., Hogan, R. J., & Zhong, W. (2001) · Immunologic Research · doi:10.1385/ir:24:1:53 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Doherty, P. C., Topham, D. J., Tripp, R. A., Cardin, R. D., Brooks, J. W., & Stevenson, P. G.
- Venue
- Immunological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-117
- ISSN
- 0105-2896 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-065X
- OpenAlex
- W2031193236
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effector CD4+ and CD8+ T‐cell mechanisms in the control of respiratory virus infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-065x.1997.tb01010.x
- The paper
- Doherty, P. C., Topham, D. J., Tripp, R. A., Cardin, R. D., Brooks, J. W., & Stevenson, P. G. (1997). Effector CD4+ and CD8+ T‐cell mechanisms in the control of respiratory virus infections. Immunological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065x.1997.tb01010.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.