The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The virtual ecologist approach: simulating data and observers
Abstract
Ecologists carry a well‐stocked toolbox with a great variety of sampling methods, statistical analyses and modelling tools, and new methods are constantly appearing. Evaluation and optimisation of these methods is crucial to guide methodological choices. Simulating error‐free data or taking high‐quality data to qualify methods is common practice. Here, we emphasise the methodology of the ‘virtual ecologist’ (VE) approach where simulated data and observer models are used to mimic real species and how they are ‘virtually’ observed. This virtual data is then subjected to statistical analyses and modelling, and the results are evaluated against the ‘true’ simulated data. The VE approach is an intuitive and powerful evaluation framework that allows a quality assessment of sampling protocols, analyses and modelling tools. It works under controlled conditions as well as under consideration of confounding factors such as animal movement and biased observer behaviour. In this review, we promote the approach as a rigorous research tool, and demonstrate its capabilities and practical relevance. We explore past uses of VE in different ecological research fields, where it mainly has been used to test and improve sampling regimes as well as for testing and comparing models, for example species distribution models. We discuss its benefits as well as potential limitations, and provide some practical considerations for designing VE studies. Finally, research fields are identified for which the approach could be useful in the future. We conclude that VE could foster the integration of theoretical and empirical work and stimulate work that goes far beyond sampling methods, leading to new questions, theories, and better mechanistic understanding of ecological systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
F. Dormann, C., M. McPherson, J., B. Araújo, M., Bivand, R., Bolliger, J., Carl, G., G. Davies, R., Hirzel, A., Jetz, W., Daniel Kissling, W., et al. (2007) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x · Cited by 3,433
Self-citationEcological models and data in R
Bolker, B. M. (2008) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4g37 · Cited by 1,297 · cited 3×
“Statistical ecologists also build replicate or simulated data sets with known properties to demonstrate the unbiasedness of new modelling methods they have developed or to show their superior efficiency in comparison to previous methods (Bolker 2008). Many introductory textbooks on statistics deal with such topics. Bo…”
MethodInfluential
Cited by
Selecting pseudo‐absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many?
Barbet‐Massin, M., Jiguet, F., Albert, C. H., & Thuiller, W. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00172.x · Cited by 2,716
Ficetola, G. F., Pansu, J., Bonin, A., Coissac, E., Giguet‐Covex, C., De Barba, M., Gielly, L., Lopes, C. M., Boyer, F., Pompanon, F., et al. (2015) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12338 · Cited by 675
When and how should intraspecific variability be considered in trait-based plant ecology?
Albert, C. H., Grassein, F., Schurr, F. M., Vieilledent, G., & Violle, C. (2011) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2011.04.003 · Cited by 621
Joint Species Distribution Modelling: With Applications in R
Ovaskainen, O., & Abrego, N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108591720 · Cited by 394
Statistical inference for stochastic simulation models - theory and application
Hartig, F., Calabrese, J. M., Reineking, B., Wiegand, T., & Huth, A. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01640.x · Cited by 384
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zurell, D., Berger, U., Cabral, J. S., Jeltsch, F., Meynard, C. N., Münkemüller, T., Nehrbass, N., Pagel, J., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., & Grimm, V.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 622-635
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W2049015414
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The virtual ecologist approach: simulating data and observers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18284.x
- The paper
- Zurell, D., Berger, U., Cabral, J. S., Jeltsch, F., Meynard, C. N., Münkemüller, T., Nehrbass, N., Pagel, J., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., & Grimm, V. (2010). The virtual ecologist approach: simulating data and observers. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18284.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.