The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New malignancy grading is a better prognostic indicator than Broders' grading in oral squamous cell carcinomas
Abstract
The prognostic value of histopathologic grading of oral squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) has varied from not any to highly significant. We have retrospectively studied all (130) SCCs registered in Norway 1963‐72 in the buccal and maxillary alveolar mucosa. From 68 of these cases biopsy specimens of accetable quality were obtained. B roders’method of grading was compared with a modification of a recent malignancy grading system recommended by A nnerothet al.which was performed only within the histologically most invasive areas of the tumors. Cox's multivariate survival analyses showed that this grading in the invasive sites had highly significant prognostic value. B roders grade had no prognostic value. The stage of tumor had also prognostic value. These highly significant results indicate that the histologically invasive areas may be primarily responsible for the clinical behavior of the tumor, and this may be of importance for the choice of therapy for oral SCC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Murray Walker, D., Boey, G., & McDonald, L. A. (2003) · Pathology · doi:10.1080/00310290310001602558 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Bryne, M., Koppang, H. S., Lilleng, R., Stene, T., Bang, G., & Dabelsteen, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 432-437
- ISSN
- 0300-9777 (ISSN-L)
- 0904-2512
- 1600-0714
- OpenAlex
- W2143280379
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
