The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Burning mouth syndrome: prevalence and associated factors
Abstract
Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is characterized by a burning sensation in the oral cavity although the oral mucosa is clinically normal. The syndrome mostly affects middle‐aged women. Various local, systemic and psychological factors have been found to be associated with BMS, but its etiology is not fully understood. Oral complaints and salivary flow were surveyed in 669 men and 758 women randomly selected from 48,500 individuals between the ages 20 and 69 years. Fifty‐three individuals (3.7%), 11 men (1.6%) and 42 women (5.5%), were classified as having BMS. In men, no BMS was found before the age group 40 to 49 years where the prevalence was 0.7%, which increased to 3.6% in the oldest age group. In women, no BMS was found in the youngest age group, but in the age group 30 to 39 years the prevalence was 0.6% and increased to 12.2% in the oldest age group. Subjective oral dryness, age, medication, taste disturbances, intake of L‐thyroxines, illness, stimulated salivary flow rate, depression and anxiety were factors associated with BMS. In individuals with BMS, the most prevalent site with burning sensations was the tongue (67.9%). The intensity of the burning sensation was estimated to be 4.6 on a visual analogue scale. There were no increased levels of depression, anxiety or stress among individuals with more pain compared to those with less pain. It was concluded that BMS should be seen as a marker of illness and/or distress, and the complex etiology of BMS demands specialist treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5 · Cited by 11,696
Development of the perceived stress questionnaire: A new tool for psychosomatic research
Levenstein, S., Prantera, C., Varvo, V., Scribano, M. L., Berto, E., Luzi, C., & Andreoli, A. (1993) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(93)90120-5 · Cited by 985
Cited by
Burning mouth syndrome: An update
Lopez-Jornet, P., Camacho-Alonso, F., Andujar-Mateos, P., Sanchez-Siles, M., & Gomez-Garcia, F. (2010) · Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal · doi:10.4317/medoral.15.e562 · Cited by 294
Cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosomatic problems in dental settings
Matsuoka, H., Chiba, I., Sakano, Y., Toyofuku, A., & Abiko, Y. (2017) · BioPsychoSocial Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13030-017-0102-z · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergdahl, M., & Bergdahl, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 350-354
- ISSN
- 0300-9777 (ISSN-L)
- 0904-2512
- 1600-0714
- OpenAlex
- W2112281362
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Burning mouth syndrome: prevalence and associated factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1999.tb02052.x
- The paper
- Bergdahl, M., & Bergdahl, J. (1999). Burning mouth syndrome: prevalence and associated factors. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1999.tb02052.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.