Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Oral premalignant lesions: is a biopsy reliable?

Holmstrup, P., Vedtofte, P., Reibel, J., Stoltze, K.·2007·Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the present retrospective study was to learn whether a biopsy of oral premalignant lesions, leukoplakia and erythroplakia, shows histopathological findings representative of the whole surgically removed lesion. Moreover, to see whether histopathological characteristics of the whole lesion are significant for future malignant development after surgery. Materials and methods: A total of 101 lesions in 96 patients were included, 42 lesions (41%) being homogenous and 50 (50%) non‐homogenous leukoplakias, whereas nine (9%) were erythroplakias. The lesions were biopsied and subsequently surgically removed on the average of 10.4 months after biopsy. Surgical specimens were examined in two or more step sections distributed throughout the specimen. The histological findings of the biopsies were compared with those of the whole lesions. After surgical intervention the patients were followed (mean 6.8 years, range: 1.5–18.6), and new biopsies taken in case of recurrences. Smokers (73%) were encouraged to quit smoking and candidal infections were treated. The possible influence of different variables on the risk of malignant development was estimated by means of logistic regression analysis. Results: Histological examination of the whole lesions showed that seven lesions (7%) harboured a carcinoma and 70 lesions (69%) showed a degree of epithelial dysplasia or carcinoma in situ. Eleven lesions (12%) developed carcinoma after a mean follow‐up period of 7.5 years. A comparison of the degree of dysplasia in the biopsies with that of the whole lesion demonstrated variation with concurrent diagnosis in 49% of the lesions and in 79% after inclusion of lesions with one degree up or down the scale of epithelial dysplasia. Conclusion: The estimated odds ratio showed that none of the associated variables including presence of any degree of epithelial dysplasia in the whole lesion, site, demarcation and smoking had influence on the risk of malignant development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00513.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Holmstrup, P., Vedtofte, P., Reibel, J., & Stoltze, K.
Venue
Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04-18
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
262-266
ISSN
  • 0300-9777 (ISSN-L)
  • 0904-2512
  • 1600-0714
OpenAlex
W1899923979
Cited by
178
References
0
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oral premalignant lesions: is a biopsy reliable? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00513.x
The paper
Holmstrup, P., Vedtofte, P., Reibel, J., & Stoltze, K. (2007). Oral premalignant lesions: is a biopsy reliable? Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00513.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.