The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical significance of isometric bite force versus electrical activity in temporal and masseter muscles
Abstract
Abstract— Bite force and activity in temporal and masseter muscles during biting and chewing were recorded in 19 control subjects and 23 subjects with symptoms and signs of functional disorders of the craniomandibular system. The entire group comprised 13 men and 29 women, 14–63 yr of age. Maximal unilateral bite force was 480 Newton (N) in control subjects and 387 N in patients, with corresponding bilateral values of 347 N and 230 N. At predetermined levels of contraction, temporalis and masseter activity were linearly related. Correlations of bite force and activity in short static contractions were significant with respect to unilateral, but not to bilateral force measurements. Only in the masseter muscle was strength of dynamic contractions during chewing significantly correlated to bite force. With the present method it was demonstrated that unilateral bite force is a simple clinical indicator of mandibular elevator strength as a whole, but inadequate to disclose asymmetric conditions. During isometric contraction, relative strength of electromyographic activity fairly accurately imaged the output of mechanical activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Unilateral, isometric bite force in 8‐68‐year‐old women and men related to occlusal factors
BAKKE, M., HOLM, B., JENSEN, B. L., MICHLER, L., & MÖLLER, E. (1990) · European Journal of Oral Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1990.tb00954.x · Cited by 317
Self-citationBakke, M., Tuxen, A., Thomsen, C. E., Bardow, A., Alkjær, T., & Jensen, B. R. (2004) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000080176 · Cited by 78
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- BAKKE, M., MICHLER, L., HAN, K., & MÖLLER, E.
- Venue
- European Journal of Oral Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 539-551
- ISSN
- 0029-845X (ISSN-L)
- 0909-8836
- 1600-0722
- OpenAlex
- W2164648247
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical significance of isometric bite force versus electrical activity in temporal and masseter muscles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1989.tb00929.x
- The paper
- BAKKE, M., MICHLER, L., HAN, K., & MÖLLER, E. (1989). Clinical significance of isometric bite force versus electrical activity in temporal and masseter muscles. European Journal of Oral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1989.tb00929.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.