Cited by 8Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animalsParathyroid Disorders and TreatmentsHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity

Chronic Effect of Aluminium Ingestion on Bone in Calcium‐Deficient Rats

Konishi, Yuko, Yagyu, Kenichi, Kinebuchi, Hideo, Saito, Noboru, Yamaguchi, Takuya, Ohtsuki, And Yuji·1996·Pharmacology & Toxicology

Abstract

In order to elucidate the relationship of osteogenesis with aluminum and iron deposition, we investigated the histopathological findings of bone in calcium and/or aluminium-deficient rats, together with levels of calcium, aluminium and iron in sera and bone tissues, and also the level of serum parathyroid hormone. Four week old male STD-Wistar rats were divided into four groups to examine the effects of four kinds of diets for ten weeks. The rats on normal diet (Group I) and normal diet+aluminum (Group II) did not show any pathological changes of the bones, but in both calcium-deficient diet group (Group III) and calcium deficient diet added aluminium (Group IV), the compact bone converted into spongy bone in varying degrees, particularly in Group IV. Aluminium deposition was demonstrated at the calcification fronts and the cement lines only in Group IV as red or violet-red lines with aluminium stain, together with iron deposition as revealed with Berlin blue stain, showing similar distribution pattern as aluminum. It was clearly indicated that aluminium and iron, instead of calcium, deposited on the calcification front of the bone under the condition of calcium deficiency, inhibiting the normal osteogenesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1996.tb00231.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long-term oral exposure to Al results in an increase in Al levels in the bone that is responsible for the bone disease.

    “Long-term oral exposure to Al results in an increase in Al levels in the bone (Ahn et al., 1995; Konishi et al., 1996) that is responsible for the bone disease.”

    From Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects (2019) · cites this paper as Konishi et al., 1996

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Konishi, Y., Yagyu, K., Kinebuchi, H., Saito, N., Yamaguchi, T., & Ohtsuki, A. Y.
Affiliations
  • Kochi Medical School Hospital (JP)
  • Kōchi University (JP)
Corresponding author
Konishi, Yuko
Venue
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-06
Volume
78
Issue
6
Pages
429-434
ISSN
0901-9928 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973898211
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology & Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Keywords
calcium deficiency, bone histopathology, bone formation, iron accumulation, aluminum deposition, trabecular bone, serum parathyroid hormone
MeSH terms
Aluminum, Animals, Bone and Bones, Bone Development, Calcium, Diet, Iron, Male, Parathyroid Hormone, Tibia, Weight Gain, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review