Cited by 137Photodynamic Therapy Research StudiesHistory of Science and MedicineTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology

How Finsen’s light cured lupus vulgaris

Møller, Kirsten Iversen, Kongshoj, Brian, Philipsen, Peter Alshede, Thomsen, Vibeke Ostergaard, Wulf, Hans Christian·2005·Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine

Abstract

In 1903, Niels Ryberg Finsen was awarded the Nobel Prize for his invention of light therapy for skin tuberculosis (lupus vulgaris). The mechanism of action has not been shown; thus, we wanted to elucidate the mechanism of Finsen's light therapy. We measured radiation that could be transmitted through his lens systems and absorption of the stain solution filters in the lamps, and related the obtained results to the possible biological effects on Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Judged from transmission characteristics all tested lens systems were glass lenses (absorbing wavelength <340 nm). The tested filters likewise absorbed wavelengths <340 nm. The methylene blue solution used to absorb heat, blocked out wavelengths below 340 nm and between 550 and 700 nm. Furthermore, fluorescence of M. tuberculosis indicated the presence of porphyrins and HPLC analysis of sonicated M. marinum showed that coproporphyrin III was present, which highly justified that porphyrins were present in M. tuberculosis. Production of singlet oxygen through radiation of porphyrins with light of e.g. 400 nm seems to be a most plausible explanation why Finsen's therapy worked in spite of the lack of shortwave ultraviolet radiation, which Finsen believed was the most effective radiation for treating skin tuberculosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2005.00159.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Visible light in the blue-green range (430-490 nm) has been used as a standard treatment of neonatal jaundice; tissue bilirubin absorbs the light and the metabolites become more lipophilic and more readily excreted.

    “Visible light in the blue-green range (430–490 nm) has been used as a standard treatment of neonatal jaundice, for example. The tissue bilirubin, possessing the heme group, absorbs the light in this spectrum and the metabolites become more lipophilic than the mother compound and are more readily excreted [92].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Møller, K. I., Kongshoj, B., Philipsen, P. A., Thomsen, V. O., & Wulf, H. C.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Møller, Kirsten Iversen
Venue
Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05-11
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
118-124
ISSN
  • 0905-4383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0781
OpenAlex
W2011544696
Cited by
137
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Photodermatology Photoimmunology & Photomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Keywords
lupus vulgaris, cutaneous tuberculosis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, porphyrins, coproporphyrin III, singlet oxygen, methylene blue, ultraviolet radiation, mechanism of action
MeSH terms
Humans, Lupus Vulgaris, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Phototherapy, Ultraviolet Rays, Ultraviolet Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review