The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Viscoelastic response to repeated static stretching in the human hamstring muscle
Abstract
The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate the reproducibility of a new method of measuring passive resistance to stretch in the human hamstring muscle group, in vivo, using a test re‐test protocol and 2) to examine the effect of repeated stretches. Passive resistance offered by the hamstring muscle group during knee extension was measured in 10 subjects as knee flexion moment (Nm) using a KinCom dynamometer. The knee was passively extended at 5 deg/s to the final position where it remained stationary for 90 s (static phase). EMG of the hamstring muscle was also measured. The test re‐test protocol included 2 tests (tests 1 and 2) administered 1 h apart. On a separate occasion 5 consecutive static stretches were administered (stretches 1–5) separted by 30 s. Stretch 6 was administered one hour after stretch 5. In the static phase passive resistance did not differ between test 1 and test 2. Resistance declined in both tests 1 and 2, whereas EMG activity remained unchanged. The decline in resistance was significant up to 45 s. For the repeated stretches there was an effect of time (90 s) and stretch (1–5) with a significant interaction i.e., resistance diminished with stretches, and the 90‐s decline was less as more stretches were performed. Passive resistance in stretch 6 was lower than in stretch 1. The present study has demonstrated a reliable method for studying resistance to stretch of the human hamstring muscle group. A viscoelastic response of the human hamstring muscle was shown. With 5 repeated stretches, resistance to stretch diminished and each stretch exibited a viscoelastic response, albeit less with each subsequent stretch. The effect of 5 repeated stretches was significant 1 h later.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness: Treatment Strategies and Performance Factors
Cheung, K., Hume, P. A., & Maxwell, L. (2003) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200333020-00005 · Cited by 1,350
Muscle Injuries: Biology and Treatment
Järvinen, T. A. H., Järvinen, T. L. N., Kääriäinen, M., Kalimo, H., & Järvinen, M. (2005) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546505274714 · Cited by 1,072
Increasing Muscle Extensibility: A Matter of Increasing Length or Modifying Sensation?
Weppler, C. H., & Magnusson, S. P. (2010) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20090012 · Cited by 435
Self-citationA mechanism for altered flexibility in human skeletal muscle.
Magnusson, S. P., Simonsen, E. B., Aagaard, P., Sørensen, H., & Kjaer, M. (1996) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021768 · Cited by 406
Self-citationA randomized trial of preexercise stretching for prevention of lower-limb injury
POPE, R. P., HERBERT, R. D., KIRWAN, J. D., & GRAHAM, B. J. (2000) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200002000-00004 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Magnusson, S. P., Simonsen, E. B., Aagaard, P., Gleim, G. W., McHugh, M. P., & Kjaer, M.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 342-347
- ISSN
- 0905-7188 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0838
- OpenAlex
- W2081798722
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Viscoelastic response to repeated static stretching in the human hamstring muscle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0838.1995.tb00056.x
- The paper
- Magnusson, S. P., Simonsen, E. B., Aagaard, P., Gleim, G. W., McHugh, M. P., & Kjaer, M. (1995). Viscoelastic response to repeated static stretching in the human hamstring muscle. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.1995.tb00056.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.