The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sensitivity of global carbon pools and fluxes to human and potential climatic impacts
Open accessAbstract
Besides the emissions from fossil sources, the anthropogenic land use changes (clearings and similar influences) the CO2 fertilization effect on the biosphere, and potential climatic fluctuations may have influenced the global carbon balance and the CO2 concentration of the atmosphere in the period 1860-1981. A sensitivity study was carried out to compare the importance of these impacts for the behaviour of fluxes and pools in biosphere, atmosphere and ocean. The Osnabriick Biosphere Model, a regionalized carbon flux model for the terrestrial biosphere, was coupled with a box diffusion Ocean model and a one-box atmosphere model. A regional land use pattern was derived from the World Atlas of Agriculture. Its dynamics were introduced using data of global land use changes. For the simulation of climatic variations, standardized changed levels as well as gradients of temperature and precipitation were used. In the period 1860-1981, land-use changes and the CO2 fertilization effects are similarly important and roughly amount to 4/5 of the fossil source. Effects of potential climatic fluctuations may not exceed 1/5 of that amount.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Potential Net Primary Productivity in South America: Application of a Global Model
Raich, J. W., Rastetter, E. B., Melillo, J. M., Kicklighter, D. W., Steudler, P. A., Peterson, B. J., Grace, A. L., Moore, B., & Vorosmarty, C. J. (1991) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.2307/1941899 · Cited by 893
Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass
Erb, K.-H., Kastner, T., Plutzar, C., Bais, A. L. S., Carvalhais, N., Fetzel, T., Gingrich, S., Haberl, H., Lauk, C., Niedertscheider, M., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25138 · Cited by 727
Amundson, R. (2001) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.29.1.535 · Cited by 721
Estimations of Global Terrestrial Productivity
Saugier, B., Roy, J., & Mooney, H. A. (2001) · Terrestrial Global Productivity · doi:10.1016/b978-012505290-0/50024-7 · Cited by 377
Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production: Patterns, Trends, and Planetary Boundaries
Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., & Krausmann, F. (2014) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-121912-094620 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- ESSER, G.
- Venue
- Tellus B
- Publisher
- Stockholm University Press
- Published
- 1987-07
- Volume
- 39B
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-260
- ISSN
- 0280-6509 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0889
- OpenAlex
- W2007739117
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity of global carbon pools and fluxes to human and potential climatic impacts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0889.1987.tb00097.x
- The paper
- ESSER, G. (1987). Sensitivity of global carbon pools and fluxes to human and potential climatic impacts. Tellus B. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.1987.tb00097.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.