Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of Down-Staging in Patients Initially Outside the Milan Selection Criteria

Open access
Ravaioli, M., Grazi, G.L., Piscaglia, F., Trevisani, F., Cescon, M., Ercolani, G., Vivarelli, M., Golfieri, R., D’Errico Grigioni, A., Panzini, I., Morelli, C., Bernardi, M., Bolondi, L., Pinna, A.D.·2008·American Journal of Transplantation

Abstract

Conventional criteria for liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are single HCC ≤ 5 cm or less than or equal to three HCCs ≤ 3 cm. We prospectively evaluated the possibility of slightly extending these criteria in a down-staging protocol, which included patients initially outside conventional criteria: single HCC 5–6 cm or two HCCs ≤ 5 cm or less than six HCCs ≤ 4 cm and sum diameter ≤ 12 cm, but within Milan criteria in the active tumors after the down-staging procedures. The outcome of patients down-staged was compared to that of Milan criteria after liver transplantation and since the first evaluation according to an intention-to-treat principle. From 2003 to 2006, 177 patients with HCC were considered for transplantation: the transplantation rate was comparable between the Milan and down-staging groups: 88/129 cases (68%) versus 32/48 cases (67%), respectively. At a median follow-up of 2.5 years after transplantation, the 1 and 3 years' disease-free survival rates were comparable: 80% and 71% in the Milan group versus 78% and 71% in the down-staging. The actuarial intention-to-treat survival was 27/48 patients (56.3%) in the down-staging and 81/129 cases (62.8%) in the Milan group, p = n.s. The proposed down-staging criteria provide a comparable outcome to the conventional criteria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02409.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 363

Metadata

Authors
Ravaioli, M., Grazi, G. L., Piscaglia, F., Trevisani, F., Cescon, M., Ercolani, G., Vivarelli, M., Golfieri, R., D’Errico Grigioni, A., Panzini, I., Morelli, C., Bernardi, M., Bolondi, L., & Pinna, A. D.
Venue
American Journal of Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
2547-2557
ISSN
1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026525583
Cited by
363
References
0
FWCI
11.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of Down-Staging in Patients Initially Outside the Milan Selection Criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02409.x
The paper
Ravaioli, M., Grazi, G. L., Piscaglia, F., Trevisani, F., Cescon, M., Ercolani, G., Vivarelli, M., Golfieri, R., D’Errico Grigioni, A., Panzini, I., Morelli, C., Bernardi, M., Bolondi, L., & Pinna, A. D. (2008). Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of Down-Staging in Patients Initially Outside the Milan Selection Criteria. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02409.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.