Cited by 99Liver Diseases and ImmunityOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments

Cyclosporine A Protects Against Primary Biliary Cirrhosis Recurrence After Liver Transplantation

Open access
Montano, A.J., Wasilenko, S., Bintner, J., Mason, A.L.·2010·American Journal of Transplantation

Abstract

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) reoccurs in a proportion of patients following liver transplantation (LT). The aims of our study were to evaluate the risk factors associated with PBC recurrence and determine whether recurrent disease constitutes a negative predictor for survival. One hundred and eight patients receiving LT for end-stage PBC were studied. Recurrent disease was diagnosed in 28 patients (26%). Probability of recurrent PBC at 5 years was 13% and 29% at 10 years with an overall incidence of 3.97 cases per 100 patient years. By univariate Cox analysis use of tacrolimus (HR 6.28, 95% CI, 2.44-16.11, p < 0.001) and mycophenolate mofetil (HR 5.21, 95% CI, 1.89-14.33, p = 0.001) were associated with higher risk of recurrence; whereas use of cyclosporine A (CsA) and azathioprine were associated with reduced risk of recurrence (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05-0.35, p < 0.001 and HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.64, p = 0.003, respectively). In the multivariate Cox analysis, only CsA was independently associated with protection against recurrence (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06-0.71, p = 0.02). Five-year probability of survival was 83% and 96%, in patients without and with recurrence (log-rank test, p = 0.3). Although PBC transplant recipients receiving CsA have a lower risk of disease recurrence, the development of recurrent PBC did not impact on long-term patient survival.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.03006.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montano, A. J., Wasilenko, S., Bintner, J., & Mason, A. L.
Affiliations
Alberta Hospital Edmonton (CA)
Corresponding author
Mason, A.L.
Venue
American Journal of Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
852-858
ISSN
1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964560241
Cited by
99
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Transplantation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Mayo Clinic
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
primary biliary cirrhosis, liver transplantation, cyclosporine, recurrence, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, immunosuppressive therapy, survival, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Male, Middle Aged, Probability, Recurrence, Multivariate Analysis, Liver Transplantation, Cyclosporine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review