The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Efficacy and Safety of 200 Days Valganciclovir Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in High‐Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients
Open accessAbstract
Late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a significant problem with a standard 3-month prophylaxis regimen. This multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of 200 days' versus 100 days' valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily) in 326 high-risk (D+/R-) kidney allograft recipients. Significantly fewer patients in the 200-day group versus the 100-day group developed confirmed CMV disease up to month 12 posttransplant (16.1% vs. 36.8%; p < 0.0001). Confirmed CMV viremia was also significantly lower in the 200-day group (37.4% vs. 50.9%; p = 0.015 at month 12). There was no significant difference in the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection between the groups (11% vs. 17%, respectively, p = 0.114). Adverse events occurred at similar rates between the groups and the majority were rated mild-to-moderate in intensity and not related to study medication. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that extending valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily) to 200 days significantly reduces the incidence of CMV disease and viremia through to 12 months compared with 100 days' prophylaxis, without significant additional safety concerns associated with longer treatment. The number needed to treat to avoid one additional patient with CMV disease up to 12 months posttransplant is approximately 5.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Griffiths, P. D., Stanton, A., McCarrell, E., Smith, C., Osman, M., Harber, M., Davenport, A., Jones, G., Wheeler, D. C., O'Beirne, J., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60136-0 · Cited by 389
Cytomegalovirus Infections in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Review
Ramanan, P., & Razonable, R. R. (2013) · Infection & Chemotherapy · doi:10.3947/ic.2013.45.3.260 · Cited by 339
Baker, R. J., Mark, P. B., Patel, R. K., Stevens, K. K., & Palmer, N. (2017) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/s12882-017-0553-2 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Humar, A., Lebranchu, Y., Vincenti, F., Blumberg, E. A., Punch, J. D., Limaye, A. P., Abramowicz, D., Jardine, A. G., Voulgari, A. T., Ives, J., Hauser, I. A., & Peeters, P.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1228-1237
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087762810
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Efficacy and Safety of 200 Days Valganciclovir Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in High‐Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03074.x
- The paper
- Humar, A., Lebranchu, Y., Vincenti, F., Blumberg, E. A., Punch, J. D., Limaye, A. P., Abramowicz, D., Jardine, A. G., Voulgari, A. T., Ives, J., Hauser, I. A., & Peeters, P. (2010). The Efficacy and Safety of 200 Days Valganciclovir Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in High‐Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03074.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.