The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Are Advantaged in the Current Liver Transplant Allocation System
Open accessAbstract
Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within Milan criteria receive priority on the liver transplant waiting list (WL) and compete with non-HCC patients. Dropout from the WL is an indirect measure of transplant access. Competing risks (CR) evaluation of dropout for HCC and non-HCC patients has not previously been reported. Patients listed between 16 March 2005 and 30 June 2008 were included. Probability of dropout was estimated using a CR technique as well as a Cox model for time to dropout. Overall, non-HCC patients had a higher dropout rate from the WL than HCC patients (p < 0.0001). This was reproducible throughout all regions. In Cox regression, tumor size, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) were associated with increased dropout risk. Multivariable analysis with CR showed that MELD score and AFP, were most influential in predicting dropout for HCC patients. The index of concordance for predicting dropout with the CR was 0.70. HCC patients appear to be advantaged in the current allocation scheme based on lower dropout rates without regard to geography. A continuous score incorporating MELD, AFP and tumor size may help to prioritize HCC patients to better equate dropout rates with non-HCC patients and equalize access.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk
Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144 · Cited by 14,290
Cited by
Marrero, J. A., Kulik, L. M., Sirlin, C. B., Zhu, A. X., Finn, R. S., Abecassis, M. M., Roberts, L. R., & Heimbach, J. K. (2018) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.29913 · Cited by 4,539
Darwish Murad, S., Kim, W. R., Harnois, D. M., Douglas, D. D., Burton, J., Kulik, L. M., Botha, J. F., Mezrich, J. D., Chapman, W. C., Schwartz, J. J., et al. (2012) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.008 · Cited by 597
Mazzaferro, V., Bhoori, S., Sposito, C., Bongini, M., Langer, M., Miceli, R., & Mariani, L. (2011) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1002/lt.22365 · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Washburn, K., Edwards, E., Harper, A., & Freeman, R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1652-1657
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1576803417
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Are Advantaged in the Current Liver Transplant Allocation System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03127.x
- The paper
- Washburn, K., Edwards, E., Harper, A., & Freeman, R. (2010). Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Are Advantaged in the Current Liver Transplant Allocation System. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03127.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.