The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three-Year Outcomes from BENEFIT, a Randomized, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients
Open accessAbstract
The clinical profile of belatacept in kidney transplant recipients was evaluated to determine if earlier results in the BENEFIT study were sustained at 3 years. BENEFIT is a randomized 3 year, phase III study in adults receiving a kidney transplant from a living or standard criteria deceased donor. Patients were randomized to a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept, or cyclosporine. 471/666 patients completed ≥3 years of therapy. A total of 92% (MI), 92% (LI), and 89% (cyclosporine) of patients survived with a functioning graft. The mean calculated GFR (cGFR) was ∼21 mL/min/1.73 m(2) higher in the belatacept groups versus cyclosporine at year 3. From month 3 to month 36, the mean cGFR increased in the belatacept groups by +1.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) /year (MI) and +1.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) /year (LI) versus a decline of -2.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) /year (cyclosporine). One cyclosporine-treated patient experienced acute rejection between year 2 and year 3. There were no new safety signals and no new posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) cases after month 18. Belatacept-treated patients maintained a high rate of patient and graft survival that was comparable to cyclosporine-treated patients, despite an early increased occurrence of acute rejection and PTLD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levey, A. S., Bosch, J. P., Lewis, J. B., Greene, T., Rogers, N., Roth, D., & for the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group* (1999) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002 · Cited by 15,079
Cited by
CD28 Costimulation: From Mechanism to Therapy
Esensten, J. H., Helou, Y. A., Chopra, G., Weiss, A., & Bluestone, J. A. (2016) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2016.04.020 · Cited by 937
Belatacept and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation
Vincenti, F., Rostaing, L., Grinyo, J., Rice, K., Steinberg, S., Gaite, L., Moal, M.-C., Mondragon-Ramirez, G. A., Kothari, J., Polinsky, M. S., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1506027 · Cited by 783
Self-citationAllen, U. D., Preiksaitis, J. K., & Practice, T. A. I. D. C. O. (2019) · Clinical Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ctr.13652 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Vincenti, F., Larsen, C. P., Alberu, J., Bresnahan, B., Garcia, V. D., Kothari, J., Lang, P., Urrea, E. M., Massari, P., Mondragon-Ramirez, G., Reyes-Acevedo, R., Rice, K., Rostaing, L., Steinberg, S., Xing, J., Agarwal, M., Harler, M. B., & Charpentier, B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 210-217
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1480967779
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three-Year Outcomes from BENEFIT, a Randomized, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03785.x
- The paper
- Vincenti, F., Larsen, C. P., Alberu, J., Bresnahan, B., Garcia, V. D., Kothari, J., Lang, P., Urrea, E. M., Massari, P., Mondragon-Ramirez, G., Reyes-Acevedo, R., Rice, K., Rostaing, L., Steinberg, S., Xing, J., Agarwal, M., Harler, M. B., & Charpentier, B. (2012). Three-Year Outcomes from BENEFIT, a Randomized, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03785.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.