Understanding the Causes of Kidney Transplant Failure: The Dominant Role of Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Nonadherence
Open accessAbstract
We prospectively studied kidney transplants that progressed to failure after a biopsy for clinical indications, aiming to assign a cause to every failure. We followed 315 allograft recipients who underwent indication biopsies at 6 days to 32 years posttransplant. Sixty kidneys progressed to failure in the follow-up period (median 31.4 months). Failure was rare after T-cell-mediated rejection and acute kidney injury and common after antibody-mediated rejection or glomerulonephritis. We developed rules for using biopsy diagnoses, HLA antibody and clinical data to explain each failure. Excluding four with missing information, 56 failures were attributed to four causes: rejection 36 (64%), glomerulonephritis 10 (18%), polyoma virus nephropathy 4 (7%) and intercurrent events 6 (11%). Every rejection loss had evidence of antibody-mediated rejection by the time of failure. Among rejection losses, 17 of 36 (47%) had been independently identified as nonadherent by attending clinicians. Nonadherence was more frequent in patients who progressed to failure (32%) versus those who survived (3%). Pure T-cell-mediated rejection, acute kidney injury, drug toxicity and unexplained progressive fibrosis were not causes of loss. This prospective cohort indicates that many actual failures after indication biopsies manifest phenotypic features of antibody-mediated or mixed rejection and also underscores the major role of nonadherence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-adherence to therapy is associated with impaired outcome in solid organ allograft recipients.
“Non-adherence to therapy is associated with impaired outcome in solid organ allograft recipients.”
From Adherence is associated with a favorable outcome after lung transplantation (2019) · cites this paper as [5]
Few publications have identified an association of non-adherence in the patient's record to impaired graft survival.
“Few publications have identified an association of non-adherence in the patient’s record to impaired graft survival[3,5].”
From Adherence is associated with a favorable outcome after lung transplantation (2019) · cites this paper as [5]
Cites
Denhaerynck, K., Dobbels, F., Cleemput, I., Desmyttere, A., Schafer-Keller, P., Schaub, S., & De Geest, S. (2005) · Transplant International · doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2005.00176.x · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baker, R. J., Mark, P. B., Patel, R. K., Stevens, K. K., & Palmer, N. (2017) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/s12882-017-0553-2 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Therapeutic Use of mTOR Inhibitors in Renal Diseases: Advances, Drawbacks, and Challenges
Viana, S. D., Reis, F., & Alves, R. (2018) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2018/3693625 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Psychosocial Challenges in Solid Organ Transplantation
Kuntz, K., Weinland, S. R., & Butt, Z. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings · doi:10.1007/s10880-015-9435-6 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Muduma, G., Odeyemi, I., Smith-Palmer, J., & Pollock, R. F. (2016) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0292-y · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Adherence is associated with a favorable outcome after lung transplantation
Bertram, A., Fuge, J., Suhling, H., Tudorache, I., Haverich, A., Welte, T., & Gottlieb, J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226167 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Few publications have identified an association of non-adherence in the patient’s record to impaired graft survival[3,5].”
Background
- Authors
- Sellarés, J., de Freitas, D. G., Mengel, M., Reeve, J., Einecke, G., Sis, B., Hidalgo, L. G., Famulski, K., Matas, A., & Halloran, P. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Halloran, P.F.
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 388-399
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127001878
- Cited by
- 1,590
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 74 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 157 · 2020: 129 · 2019: 130 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 123 · 2016: 116 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 45.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Transplantation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Genome Canada
- Ministry of Advanced Education, Government of Alberta
- University of Alberta
- Kidney Foundation of Canada
- Roche Organ Transplant Research Foundation
- Ministry of Advanced Education
- Astellas Pharma
- Ministry of Advanced Education and Technology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Organ Donation and Transplantation
- Keywords
- kidney transplant failure, antibody-mediated rejection, T cell-mediated rejection, non-compliance, HLA antibodies, glomerulonephritis, polyomavirus-associated nephropathy, acute kidney injury, drug toxicity, progressive fibrosis, mixed rejection
- MeSH terms
- Biopsy, Follow-Up Studies, Graft Rejection, Graft Survival, Humans, Kidney, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Transplantation, Homologous, Kidney Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Immunity, Humoral
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review