The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pulpal healing after luxation injuries and root fracture in the permanent dentition
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Pulpal healing patterns were studied in a clinical material of 637 luxated and 95 root‐fractured permanent incisors followed routinely for up to 11 years. It was found that pulpal healing patterns could generally be divided into 3 groups according to the degree of injury sustained by the pulp: little, moderate or severe. Thus after luxation injuries, pulp survival could be without radiographic change (PS), with pulp canal obliteration (PCO) or nonhealing (pulp necrosis (PN)). After root fracture, similar healing patterns could be observed: healing by hard tissue union of fragments (HT), by connective tissue union of fragments (CT) or by nonunion due to interposition of granulation tissue between fragments (GT) resulting from PN of the coronal fragment. In both trauma situations, healing or nonhealing could be determined by type of luxation injury, stage of root development and type of fixation used (forceful application of orthodontic bands vs. passively applied acid‐etch fixation). Pulpal healing complications (PN or GT) were based on clinical findings (coronal discoloration, loss of pulpal sensibility) and radiographic findings (resorption processes of the lamina dura at the root apex or at the level of the root fracture). However, in both injury groups the same changes could also be seen to be intermediate steps in the pulpal healing process. Based on findings from these studies, hypotheses for the mechanics of pulpal healing are proposed as well as guidelines for acute and later treatment of dental luxations, root fractures and the diagnosis of healing complications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Age Variation of Formation Stages for Ten Permanent Teeth
Moorrees, C. F. A., Fanning, E. A., & Hunt, E. E. (1963) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345630420062701 · Cited by 2,215
Prognosis of luxated permanent teeth--the development of pulp necrosis
Andreasen, F. M., & Pedersen, B. V. (1985) · Dental Traumatology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1985.tb00583.x · Cited by 419
Self-citationANDREASEN, J. O. (1970) · European Journal of Oral Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1970.tb02074.x · Cited by 312
Occurrence of pulp canal obliteration after luxation injuries in the permanent dentition
Andreasen, F. M., Zhjie, Y., Thomsen, B. L., & Andersen, P. K. (1987) · Dental Traumatology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1987.tb00611.x · Cited by 256
Self-citationThe prognosis of traumatized permanent anterior teeth with fracture of the enamel and dentin
Zadik, D., Chosack, A., & Eidelman, E. (1979) · Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology · doi:10.1016/0030-4220(79)90175-0 · Cited by 67
Cited by
Prevention and management of external inflammatory resorption following trauma to teeth
Abbott, P. (2016) · Australian Dental Journal · doi:10.1111/adj.12400 · Cited by 131
Pulpal response to sensibility tests after traumatic dental injuries in permanent teeth
Bastos, J. V., Goulart, E. M. A., & de Souza Côrtes, M. I. (2014) · Dental Traumatology · doi:10.1111/edt.12074 · Cited by 76
Pulp canal obliteration after traumatic injuries in permanent teeth – scientific fact or fiction?
Bastos, J. V., & Côrtes, M. I. D. S. (2018) · Brazilian Oral Research · doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0075 · Cited by 69
Treatment of extrusive luxation in permanent teeth: Literature review with systematic criteria
Okamoto, R., de Faria, L. P., Amaral, M. F., de Almeida, M. M., Brandini, D. A., & Poi, W. R. (2017) · The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2024 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Andreasen, F. M.
- Venue
- Dental Traumatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 111-131
- ISSN
- 1600-4469 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-9657
- OpenAlex
- W2016209441
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.