Pulp exposure after stepwise versus direct complete excavation of deep carious lesions in young posterior permanent teeth

Abstract

Abstract The aim was to assess the prevalence of pulp exposure alter stepwise versus direct complete excavation of permanent posterior teeth with deep carious lesions. The material, representing 116 patients aged 6‐l6yrs (= 10.2 yrs), consisted of 127 teeth with radiographs revealing carious lesions to such a depth that pulp exposure could he expected if direct complete excavation was performed. Teeth with clinical symptoms, other than transient pain shortly before treatment, were not accepted. The teeth were randomly selected for either treatment procedure. Stepwise excavation implied removal of the bulk of carious tissue and application of calcium hydroxide, followed by sealing of the cavity with zinc‐oxide eugenol cement. After a period of 8–24 weeks the rest of the carious dentin was removed and the cavity sealed with calcium hydroxide, zinc‐oxide‐eugenol (ZOE) and a restorative material. Direct complete excavation entailed removal of all carious dentin followed by sealing as mentioned above. In case of pulp exposure, pulp treatment was performed. The pulp was exposed in 40 of the teeth treated by direct complete excavation. The corresponding figure for those treated by stepwise excavation was 17.5%. The difference was statistically significant. The teeth with no pulp exposure after direct or stepwise excavation showed normal clinical and radiographic conditions at the last check‐up (= 43 mouths).