The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Periapical status, quality of root canal fillings and estimated endodontic treatment needs in an urban German population
Abstract
Abstract The objective of this study was to determine the periapical status and the quality of root canal fillings and to estimate the endodontic treatment needs in a German population. Clinical and radiographic data and the operative procedures performed were evaluated on 323 patients coming to a dental surgery in Stuttgart, Germany, in 1993. In 182 individuals at least one tooth exhibited a root canal filling, a necrotic pulp or an irreversible pulpitis. Out of the 7897 teeth examined, 215 (2.7%) had a root canal treatment (category A), 122 being nonendodontically treated (1.5%) did not respond to the sensitivity test (category B) and 53 (0.7%) were diagnosed as having irreversible inflamed pulp tissue (category C). The prevalence of teeth associated with radiographic signs of periapical pathosis was 61 % in the group of root canal filled teeth and 88% in the group of pulpless and non‐endodontically treated teeth. Using the level and the density of the root canal filling as criteria for evaluating the technical standard, only 14% of the endodontic treatments of non‐apicectomized teeth were qualified as adequate. The minimal endodontic treatment need is 2.3% related to all examined teeth when the root canal filled teeth with clinical symptoms of periapical periodontitis (category A) and those of categories B and C are included. The real endodontic treatment need is suggested to be larger when considering that the technical quality of the obturation is poor in most symptomless endodontically treated teeth associated with a periapical lesion. In the case of retreatment of these teeth, the endodontic treatment need would then be calculated at 3.7%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A New Periapical Index Based on Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Estrela, C., Bueno, M. R., Azevedo, B. C., Azevedo, J. R., & Pécora, J. D. (2008) · Journal of Endodontics · doi:10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.013 · Cited by 432
Levels of evidence for the outcome of nonsurgical endodontic treatment
Torabinejad, M., Kutsenko, D., Machnick, T. K., Ismail, A., & Newton, C. W. (2005) · Journal of Endodontics · doi:10.1097/01.don.0000153593.64951.14 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiger, R., Hitzler, S., Hermle, G., & Löst, C.
- Venue
- Dental Traumatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 69-74
- ISSN
- 1600-4469 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-9657
- OpenAlex
- W2064173300
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Periapical status, quality of root canal fillings and estimated endodontic treatment needs in an urban German population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1997.tb00013.x
- The paper
- Weiger, R., Hitzler, S., Hermle, G., & Löst, C. (1997). Periapical status, quality of root canal fillings and estimated endodontic treatment needs in an urban German population. Dental Traumatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1997.tb00013.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.