Morphological integration of the skull in craniofacial anomalies
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES - To understand how surgical interventions impact the organization and internal integration of the major components of the skull, we address the functional and developmental relationships during perinatal development. METHODS - A number of methods for quantifying modularity and integration of morphological data are available. Here, measures derived from three-dimensional computed tomographic (CT) images are used to investigate the statistical relationships among measures of the cranial vault, face and cranial base. First, we establish the pattern of associations among quantitative measures in a sample of children unaffected by a craniofacial anomaly. We statistically compare these normative patterns of cranial integration to those of a sample of children with a facial anomaly (complete unilateral complete cleft lip and palate), and to children with a neurocranial anomaly (isolated sagittal synostosis). Finally, we test whether surgery affects the strength and pattern of associations among measures within the cranial base in the affected children. RESULTS - Our analyses reveal strong internal integration of the cranial base in unaffected children and in our samples of unoperated cleft lip and palate, and sagittal synostosis. Post-operatively, the magnitude of integration of the cranial base is reduced relative to the pre-operative condition in both samples of children with craniofacial anomalies. CONCLUSION - Our results show how the cranial base adjusts to its broader structural context, and provides added support for the developmental and structural integration of cranial base with both cranial vault and face.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Children with craniosynostoses usually develop malformations of the skeletal face and base.
“Likewise, children with craniosynostoses usually develop malformations of the skeletal face and base [45,46].”
From Morphological consequences of artificial cranial deformation: Modularity and integration (2020) · cites this paper as [45]
The Discussion reports that sagittal synostosis affects the face and vault, and the Conclusions refer to facial or vault dysmorphogenesis. But the paper studies a sample with sagittal synostosis, not craniosynostoses generally, and does not establish that children usually develop malformations of both the skeletal face and cranial base. It reports relatively stable integration within the cranial base. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 47
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [15]Olson E Miller R Morphological Integration Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press 1999
- [22]DeLeon V Kane AA Valeri CJ Richtsmeier JT Lo LJ Lilja J The effects of growth and lip repair upon osseous facial morphology in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: an analysis of longitudinal CT data Transactions of the 9th International Congress on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies Götenburg Elanders Novum 2001 293 8
- Authors
- Richtsmeier, J., & DeLeon, V.
- Venue
- Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07-13
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 149-158
- ISSN
- 1601-6335 (ISSN-L)
- 1601-6343
- PMC
- PMC2804975
- OpenAlex
- W2169796749
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R01DD000350)
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE018500, P60DE013078, R01DE016886)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
- Keywords
- craniofacial anomalies, skull base, cranial vault, facial morphology, morphological integration, modularity, cleft lip and palate, sagittal synostosis, craniofacial surgery, craniofacial development
- MeSH terms
- Cephalometry, Child, Preschool, Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, Cranial Sutures, Craniosynostoses, Cross-Sectional Studies, Facial Asymmetry, Facial Bones, Frontal Bone, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Nasal Bone, Occipital Bone, Parietal Bone, Skull, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Zygoma, Models, Statistical, Skull Base, Craniofacial Abnormalities, Imaging, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review