The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The efficacy of sucrose for relieving procedural pain in neonates—a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Abstract
Abstract The objective was to determine the efficacy and optimal dose of sucrose for relieving procedural pain in neonates. Data were obtained using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Reference Update and personal files and assessed for quality of the methods. Data from all randomized controlled trials where term and preterm neonates received a heelstick or venipuncture were examined for the efficacy of different sucrose doses (0.18 g, 0.24 g, 0.48 g or 0.50 g, 1.0 g) and water (placebo). The primary outcome was the proportion of time crying during 3 min after the painful stimulus. Data were combined across studies using a random effects model, adapted for use with single groups, producing a point estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI). Thirteen trials were identified; eight were rejected as data were inappropriate, non‐extractable, or the primary outcome was not measured. Five studies provided data on 271 infants. The proportion of time crying did not differ between 0.18 g of sucrose and water (p > 0.05) but was significantly lower in all other sucrose groups. There were no differences in proportion of time crying between term and preterm neonates. Sucrose reduced the proportion of time crying during painful procedures in neonates. The 0.18 g dose of sucrose was ineffective. Doses of 0.24 g (2 ml of 12% sucrose solution) were most effective. A dose of 0.50 g provided no additional benefit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The combination of estimates from different experiments
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001666 · Cited by 5,380
Cited by
Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures
Stevens, B., Yamada, J., Ohlsson, A., Haliburton, S., & Shorkey, A. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001069.pub5 · Cited by 567
Self-citationSkin-to-Skin Contact Is Analgesic in Healthy Newborns
Gray, L., Watt, L., & Blass, E. M. (2000) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.105.1.e14 · Cited by 493
Relief of Pain and Anxiety in Pediatric Patients in Emergency Medical Systems
Fein, J. A., Zempsky, W. T., Cravero, J. P., THE COMMITTEE ON PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE AND SECTION ON ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN MEDICINE, Shaw, K. N., Ackerman, A. D., Chun, T. H., Conners, G. P., Dudley, N. C., Fein, J. A., et al. (2012) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2536 · Cited by 450
Cignacco, E., Hamers, J. P. H., Stoffel, L., van Lingen, R. A., Gessler, P., McDougall, J., & Nelle, M. (2007) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.02.010 · Cited by 306
Implementing evidence-based nursing: some misconceptions
DiCenso, A., Cullum, N., & Ciliska, D. (1998) · Evidence Based Nursing · doi:10.1136/ebn.1.2.38 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevens, B., Taddio, A., Ohlsson, A., & Einarson, T.
- Venue
- Acta Paediatrica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 837-842
- ISSN
- 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
- 0803-5253
- 1651-2227
- OpenAlex
- W2035750279
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The efficacy of sucrose for relieving procedural pain in neonates—a systematic review and meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1997.tb08607.x
- The paper
- Stevens, B., Taddio, A., Ohlsson, A., & Einarson, T. (1997). The efficacy of sucrose for relieving procedural pain in neonates—a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acta Paediatrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1997.tb08607.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.