The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Infant feeding practices and associated factors in the first six months of life: The Norwegian Infant Nutrition Survey
Abstract
Aim: To describe and evaluate infant feeding practices during the first 6 mo of life in relation to recommendations, and to study infant feeding practices in relation to maternal and infant characteristics. Methods: Data from 2383 Norwegian infants aged 6 mo were collected by a self‐administered semi‐quantitative food‐frequency questionnaire measuring feeding practices at 6 mo and feeding practices retrospectively at ≤5.5 mo of age. Results: Only 1% of the infants had never been breastfed. The proportion of breastfed infants was 96% at 1 mo, 85% at 4 mo and 80% at 6 mo. The proportion of exclusively breastfed infants was 90% at 1 mo, 44% at 4 mo and 7% at 6 mo. Twenty‐one percent of the infants were introduced to solid foods before the age of 4 mo. For exclusive breastfeeding at 4 mo, breastfeeding at 6 mo and timely introduction of solid foods (not before 4 mo) significant positive trends were found for maternal age, education and degree of urbanization. Negative associations were found for maternal smoking. Furthermore, exclusive breastfeeding at 4 mo was associated with infant gender and marital status, and the odds of breastfeeding at 6 mo significantly decreased with decreasing infant birthweight. Finally, both the odds of exclusive breastfeeding at 4 mo and of breastfeeding at 6 mo increased with increasing numbers of children. Conclusion: These results indicate that a majority of Norwegian infants are fed in accordance with infant feeding recommendations during their first 6 mo of life. However, the duration of exclusive breastfeeding is shorter than recommended. Infant feeding practices are significantly associated with maternal and infant characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Factors that positively influence breastfeeding duration to 6 months: A literature review
Meedya, S., Fahy, K., & Kable, A. (2010) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2010.02.002 · Cited by 604
Predictors of Breastfeeding Duration: Evidence From a Cohort Study
Scott, J. A., Binns, C. W., Oddy, W. H., & Graham, K. I. (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1991 · Cited by 526
Kimani-Murage, E. W., Madise, N. J., Fotso, J.-C., Kyobutungi, C., Mutua, M. K., Gitau, T. M., & Yatich, N. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-396 · Cited by 305
Factors associated with breastfeeding at six months postpartum in a group of Australian women
Forster, D. A., McLachlan, H. L., & Lumley, J. (2006) · International Breastfeeding Journal · doi:10.1186/1746-4358-1-18 · Cited by 280
Kehler, H. L., Chaput, K. H., & Tough, S. C. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/bf03405274 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Lande, B., Andersen, L., Bærug, A., Trygg, K., Lund‐Larsen, K., Veierød, M., & Bjørneboe, G. A.
- Venue
- Acta Paediatrica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 152-161
- ISSN
- 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
- 0803-5253
- 1651-2227
- OpenAlex
- W2133015196
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infant feeding practices and associated factors in the first six months of life: The Norwegian Infant Nutrition Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00519.x
- The paper
- Lande, B., Andersen, L., Bærug, A., Trygg, K., Lund‐Larsen, K., Veierød, M., & Bjørneboe, G. A. (2003). Infant feeding practices and associated factors in the first six months of life: The Norwegian Infant Nutrition Survey. Acta Paediatrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00519.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.