Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationship between prenatal infant feeding intention and initiation and duration of breastfeeding: a cohort study

Donath, SM, Amir, LH, The ALSPAC Study Team·2003·Acta Paediatrica

Abstract

Aim: To report the relationship between maternal prenatal intention to breastfeed and the actual initiation and duration of breastfeeding. Methods: Pregnant women resident within Avon, UK, expected to give birth between 1 April 1991 and 31 December 1992 were recruited in a longitudinal cohort study. Main outcome measures included maternal infant feeding intention (breastfeed, breast and bottle feed, bottle feed, or uncertain) at 32 wk of pregnancy; intention in the first week, intention for the rest of the first month and intention in months 2 to 4; initiation and duration of breastfeeding up to six months. Results: Data were available on 10548 women. Prenatal intention to breastfeed had an influence on both initiation and duration of breastfeeding. Of the women intending to bottle feed from birth, only 3.4% initiated breastfeeding compared with 96.6% of women planning to breastfeed for at least four months. At six months postpartum, the mean duration of breastfeeding for women intending to breastfeed for at least five months was 4.4 mo (95% CI 4.3, 4.4), compared with 2.5 mo (95% CI 2.4, 2.6) for women with a prenatal intention to breastfeed for only one month. Logistic regression, using intended duration as the only explanatory variable, correctly predicted 91.4% of breastfeeding initiation and 72.2% of infant feeding at six months. Conclusions: This large population‐based study confirms the strength of the relationship between maternal prenatal intention to breastfeed and both breastfeeding initiation and duration. Maternal intention was a stronger predictor than the standard demographic factors combined. This should be taken into account in future research, and trials should be undertaken to establish whether interventions could alter maternal intention and thereby increase rates of breastfeeding initiation and duration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00558.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Donath, S., Amir, L., & The ALSPAC Study Team
Venue
Acta Paediatrica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
352-356
ISSN
  • 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-5253
  • 1651-2227
OpenAlex
W2070944687
Cited by
285
References
1
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship between prenatal infant feeding intention and initiation and duration of breastfeeding: a cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00558.x
The paper
Donath, S., Amir, L., & The ALSPAC Study Team. (2003). Relationship between prenatal infant feeding intention and initiation and duration of breastfeeding: a cohort study. Acta Paediatrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00558.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.