Cited by 58Obesity, Physical Activity, DietBody Composition Measurement TechniquesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Population‐based waist circumference and waist‐to‐height ratio reference values in preschool children

Roswall, Josefine, Bergman, Stefan, Almqvist‐Tangen, Gerd, Alm, Bernt, Niklasson, Aimon, Nierop, Andreas FM, Dahlgren, Jovanna·2009·Acta Paediatrica

Abstract

AIM: To establish new reference values for measurements of waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio in preschool children. METHODS: A population-based, cross-sectional study of 4502 children aged 0-5 years derived from child health care in a Swedish county. Measurements of weight, height and waist circumference were recorded using a standardized procedure. RESULTS: New reference values for waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio for preschool children are presented. Reference charts were constructed and are presented. Waist circumference increased with age (r = 0.80, p < 0.001). After adjustment to the individual height, expressed as waist-to-height ratio, there was an inverse correlation to age during the first 5 years of age (r = -0.87, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The new reference values for waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio for Swedish preschool children enable future identification of new risk populations for childhood obesity. For clinicians, new reference charts for these two variables are provided for practical use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01430.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • International studies have shown that the WHtR cutoff of 0.5 is not applicable to children or adolescents, and that it would be better to use WHtR percentiles specific for age and sex.

    “International studies have also shown that the WHtR cutoff of 0.5, which is mainly used in adults, is not applicable to children or adolescents, who are still growing, and that it would be better to use WHtR percentiles that are specific for age and sex.16,32”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roswall, J., Bergman, S., Almqvist‐Tangen, G., Alm, B., Niklasson, A., Nierop, A. F., & Dahlgren, J.
Affiliations
  • Hallands sjukhus Halmstad (SE)
  • Spenshult Hospital (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Roswall, Josefine
Venue
Acta Paediatrica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09
Volume
98
Issue
10
Pages
1632-1636
ISSN
  • 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-5253
  • 1651-2227
OpenAlex
W2037648222
Cited by
58
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Paediatrica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, preschool children, reference values, reference charts, childhood obesity, abdominal obesity, anthropometry, age-related growth
MeSH terms
Body Height, Body Weights and Measures, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Obesity, Reference Values, Sweden, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Overweight, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review