Experimental trampling and vegetation recovery in some forest and heathland communities
Abstract
Abstract. Over the past decades outdoor recreation has become progressively more important and as a result human‐induced potential damage has increased. In this study, short‐term effects – a 2‐yr period – of human trampling on some common forest and heath communities in Central Belgium were studied experimentally. Vulnerability to disturbance was compared among plant communities in terms of resistance, resilience and tolerance, which are based on cover measurements. The herb layer of the examined mesophilous forest communities appeared to be more sensitive than the heath and dry forest community, which were dominated by more resistant graminoid (Molinia caerulea, Deschampsiaflexuosa) and dwarf‐shrub species (Vaccinium myrtillus, Calluna vulgaris, Erica tetralix). The analysis showed that site structure and vegetation were already affected by low intensities of trampling, while vegetation recovery during the first year after trampling was limited in most plant communities. Recovery during the second year in vegetation cover as well as height was most pronounced in mesophilous forest communities. Occasional trampling clearly can lead to increased visual evidence of previous use and continued recreational disturbance. Therefore management plans should discourage hiking activity off paths and restrict recreation activities to the least vulnerable communities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recreational activities on beaches, particularly trampling in high-traffic areas, impact vegetation development.
“Recreational activities on beaches, particularly trampling in high-traffic areas, impact vegetation development.”
From Towards integrated management of sandy anthropogenic shores: Developing tools for the exploration of human-natural interactions (2025) · cites this paper as Roovers et al., 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Roovers, P., Verheyen, K., Hermy, M., & Gulinck, H.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Roovers, P.
- Verheyen, K.
- Hermy, M.
- Gulinck, H.
- Venue
- Applied Vegetation Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02-24
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-118
- ISSN
- 1402-2001 (ISSN-L)
- 1654-109X
- OpenAlex
- W2123648573
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Vegetation Science (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- trampling, recreational disturbance, vegetation recovery, forest plant communities, herb layer, Molinia caerulea, Avenella flexuosa, Vaccinium myrtillus, Calluna vulgaris, Erica tetralix, hiking, vegetation management, central Belgium
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review