The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Partitioning of functional diversity reveals the scale and extent of trait convergence and divergence
Open accessAbstract
Questions: Trait differentiation among species occurs at different spatial scales within a region. How does the partitioning of functional diversity help to identify different community assembly mechanisms? Location: Northeastern Spain. Methods: Functional diversity can be partitioned into within‐community (α) and among‐communities (β) components, in analogy to Whittaker's classical α and β species diversity concept. In light of ecological null models, we test and discuss two algorithms as a framework to measure α and β functional diversity (the Rao quadratic entropy index and the variance of trait values). Species and trait (specific leaf area) data from pastures under different climatic conditions in NE Spain are used as a case study. Results: The proposed indices show different mathematical properties but similarly account for the spatial components of functional diversity. For all vegetation types along the climatic gradient, the observed α functional diversity was lower than expected at random, an observation consistent with the hypothesis of trait convergence resulting from habitat filtering. On the other hand, our data exhibited a remarkably higher functional diversity within communities compared to among communities (α≫β). In contrast to the high species turnover, there was a limited functional diversity turnover among communities, and a large part of the trait divergence occurred among coexisting species. Conclusions: Partitioning functional diversity within and among communities revealed that both trait convergence and divergence occur in the formation of assemblages from the local species pool. A considerable trait convergence exists at the regional scale in spite of changes in species composition, suggesting the existence of ecological redundancy among communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S., Ewel, J. J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J. H., Lodge, D. M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., et al. (2005) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/04-0922 · Cited by 8,046
Self-citationMeasuring biological diversity
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-1547 · Cited by 6,621
The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species
Macarthur, R., & Levins, R. (1967) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282505 · Cited by 4,611
Measuring Biological Diversity
REID, J. R. W. (2005) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01502.x · Cited by 4,442
Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes
Dı́az, S., & Cabido, M. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02283-2 · Cited by 3,306
Plant Ecological Strategies: Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species
Westoby, M., Falster, D. S., Moles, A. T., Vesk, P. A., & Wright, I. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452 · Cited by 3,069
Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Falster, D. S., Garnier, E., Hikosaka, K., Lamont, B. B., Lee, W., Oleksyn, J., Osada, N., et al. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01349.x · Cited by 2,598
Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward
Petchey, O. L., & Gaston, K. J. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00924.x · Cited by 2,571
Clymo, R. S., & Whittaker, R. H. (1970) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2258550 · Cited by 2,436
Cited by
Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory
HilleRisLambers, J., Adler, P. B., Harpole, W. S., Levine, J. M., & Mayfield, M. M. (2012) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160411 · Cited by 1,448
Intraspecific functional variability: extent, structure and sources of variation
Albert, C. H., Thuiller, W., Yoccoz, N. G., Soudant, A., Boucher, F., Saccone, P., & Lavorel, S. (2010) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01651.x · Cited by 667
Self-citationGarnier, E., & Navas, M.-L. (2012) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0036-y · Cited by 490
mFD: an R package to compute and illustrate the multiple facets of functional diversity
Magneville, C., Loiseau, N., Albouy, C., Casajus, N., Claverie, T., Escalas, A., Leprieur, F., Maire, E., Mouillot, D., & Villéger, S. (2022) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.05904 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- De Bello, F., Thuiller, W., Lepš, J., Choler, P., Clément, J., Macek, P., Sebastià, M., & Lavorel, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Vegetation Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05-20
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 475-486
- ISSN
- 1100-9233 (ISSN-L)
- 1654-1103
- OpenAlex
- W2016120438
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 16.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partitioning of functional diversity reveals the scale and extent of trait convergence and divergence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01042.x
- The paper
- De Bello, F., Thuiller, W., Lepš, J., Choler, P., Clément, J., Macek, P., Sebastià, M., & Lavorel, S. (2009). Partitioning of functional diversity reveals the scale and extent of trait convergence and divergence. Journal of Vegetation Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01042.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.