The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unmet Need for Family Planning in Developing Countries and Implications for Population Policy
Abstract
Unmet need for family planning has been a core concept in international population discourse for several decades. This article reviews the history of unmet need and the development of increasingly refined methods of its empirical measurement and delineates the main questions that have been raised about unmet need during the past decade, some of which concern the validity of the concept and others its role in policy debates. The discussion draws heavily on empirical research conducted during the 1990s, much of it localized, in‐depth studies combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Of the causes of unmet need other than those related to access to services, three emerge as especially salient: lack of necessary knowledge about contraceptive methods, social opposition to their use, and health concerns about possible side effects. The article argues that the concept of unmet need for family planning, by joining together contraceptive behavior and fertility preferences, encourages an integration of family planning programs and broader development approaches to population policy. By focusing on the fulfillment of individual aspirations, unmet need remains a defensible rationale for the formulation of population policy and a sensible guide to the design of family planning programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Population policy options in the developing world
Bongaarts, J. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8303293 · Cited by 279
Cited by
Starrs, A. M., Ezeh, A. C., Barker, G., Basu, A., Bertrand, J. T., Blum, R., Coll-Seck, A. M., Grover, A., Laski, L., Roa, M., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30293-9 · Cited by 1,598
Sedgh, G., & Hussain, R. (2014) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00382.x · Cited by 417
The Causes of Stalling Fertility Transitions
Bongaarts, J. (2006) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2006.00079.x · Cited by 199
The Long‐Term Fertility Impact of the Navrongo Project in Northern Ghana
Phillips, J. F., Jackson, E. F., Bawah, A. A., MacLeod, B., Adongo, P., Baynes, C., & Williams, J. (2012) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2012.00316.x · Cited by 61
Is Demography Just a Numerical Exercise? Numbers, Politics, and Legacies of China’s One-Child Policy
Wang, F., Cai, Y., Shen, K., & Gietel-Basten, S. (2018) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-018-0658-7 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Casterline, J. B., & Sinding, S. W.
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 691-723
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- 1728-4457
- OpenAlex
- W2137877360
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unmet Need for Family Planning in Developing Countries and Implications for Population Policy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00691.x
- The paper
- Casterline, J. B., & Sinding, S. W. (2000). Unmet Need for Family Planning in Developing Countries and Implications for Population Policy. Population and Development Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00691.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.