The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women's Autonomy in India and Pakistan: The Influence of Religion and Region
Abstract
This article compares the lives of women and explores dimensions of their autonomy in different regions of South Asia—Punjab in Pakistan, and Uttar Pradesh in north India and Tamil Nadu in south India. It explores the contextual factors underlying observed differences and assesses the extent to which these differences could be attributed to religion, nationality, or north–south cultural distinctions. Findings suggest that while women's autonomy—in terms of decision‐making, mobility, freedom from threatening relations with husband, and access to and control over economic resources—is constrained in all three settings, women in Tamil Nadu fare considerably better than other women, irrespective of religion. Findings lend little support to the suggestion that women in Pakistan have less autonomy or control over their lives than do Indian women. Nor do Muslim women—be they Indian or Pakistani—exercise less autonomy in their own lives than do Hindu women in the subcontinent. Rather, findings suggest that in the patriarchal and gender‐stratified structures governing the northern portion of the subcontinent, women's control over their lives is more constrained than in the southern region.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Women’s Education, Autonomy, and Reproductive Behaviour: Experience from Developing Countries
Jejeebhoy, S. J. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198290339.001.0001 · Cited by 481
Self-citation
Cited by
Individual and Contextual Determinants of Domestic Violence in North India
Koenig, M. A., Stephenson, R., Ahmed, S., Jejeebhoy, S. J., & Campbell, J. (2006) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2004.050872 · Cited by 548
Self-citationWhen Does Religion Influence Fertility?
McQuillan, K. (2004) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00002.x · Cited by 434
Riaz, S., & Pervaiz, Z. (2018) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-018-0713-x · Cited by 49
Qureshi, R., & Pacquiao, D. F. (2013) · Journal of Transcultural Nursing · doi:10.1177/1043659613493438 · Cited by 36
Batura, N., Poupakis, S., Das, S., Bapat, U., Alcock, G., Skordis, J., Haghparast-Bidgoli, H., Pantvaidya, S., & Osrin, D. (2022) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-022-13216-7 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Jejeebhoy, S. J., & Sathar, Z. A.
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 687-712
- ISSN
- 0098-7921 (ISSN-L)
- 1728-4457
- OpenAlex
- W2079363024
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women's Autonomy in India and Pakistan: The Influence of Religion and Region. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2001.00687.x
- The paper
- Jejeebhoy, S. J., & Sathar, Z. A. (2001). Women's Autonomy in India and Pakistan: The Influence of Religion and Region. Population and Development Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2001.00687.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.