The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Obstacles to Contraceptive Use in Pakistan: A Study in Punjab
Abstract
The principal aim of this study is to assess the strength in Pakistan of a set of hypothesized obstacles to practicing contraception. Survey data are analyzed that were collected in Punjab province in 1996 and that contain unusually detailed measurement of various perceived costs of practicing contraception, as well as focused measurement of fertility motivation. The framework guiding the research specifies six major obstacles to contraceptive use: the strength of motivation to avoid pregnancy, awareness and knowledge of contraception, the social and cultural acceptability of contraception, perceptions of the husband's preferences and attitudes, health concerns, and perceived access to services. Net effects of each obstacle are estimated through structural equation modeling of the intention to practice contraception in the near future, in which the six obstacles are treated as latent variables. The estimates indicate that the two principal obstacles to using a contraceptive are the woman's perception that such behavior would conflict with her husband's fertility preferences and his attitudes toward family planning and her perception of the social or cultural unacceptability of contraception. The results confirm the value of taking contraceptive costs seriously, and, in particular, of attempting to measure these costs in empirical research on family planning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sedgh, G., & Hussain, R. (2014) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00382.x · Cited by 417
Contraceptive Change and Fertility Transition
Kantorová, V., & Bongaarts, J. (2024) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/padr.12689 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Casterline, J. B., Sathar, Z. A., & ul Haque, M.
- Venue
- Studies in Family Planning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95-110
- ISSN
- 0039-3665 (ISSN-L)
- 1728-4465
- OpenAlex
- W2144097362
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Obstacles to Contraceptive Use in Pakistan: A Study in Punjab. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00095.x
- The paper
- Casterline, J. B., Sathar, Z. A., & ul Haque, M. (2001). Obstacles to Contraceptive Use in Pakistan: A Study in Punjab. Studies in Family Planning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00095.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.