The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Persistence and adherence in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome with anticholinergic therapy: a systematic review of the literature: OAB treatment persistence and adherence
Abstract
Overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) is a chronic condition that has an impact on patients' daily activities and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Anticholinergic therapy is often prescribed following insufficient results with behaviour modification alone; however, rates of treatment discontinuation are consistently high. This study systematically reviewed persistence and adherence data in patients with OAB treated with anticholinergic therapy. A search focused on the intersection of OAB, persistence/adherence, and anticholinergic therapy was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Articles published after 1998 were reviewed and selected for inclusion based on prespecified criteria. A total of 147 articles and two abstracts were included in the review. Results from 12-week clinical trials showed high rates of discontinuation, ranging from 4% to 31% and 5% to 20% in treatment and placebo groups, respectively. Unsurprisingly, rates of discontinuation found in medical claims studies were substantially higher, with 43% to 83% of patients discontinuing medication within the first 30 days and rates continuing to rise over time. Findings from medical claims studies also suggest that over half of patients never refill their initial prescription and that adherence levels tend to be low, with mean/median medication possession ratio (MPR) values ranging from 0.30 to 0.83. The low levels of persistence and adherence documented in this review reveal cause for concern about the balance between the efficacy and tolerability of anticholinergic agents. Strategies should be identified to increase persistence and adherence. New agents and non-pharmacologic alternatives with good efficacy and minimal side effects should be explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702
Cited by
Chapple, C., Sievert, K.-D., MacDiarmid, S., Khullar, V., Radziszewski, P., Nardo, C., Thompson, C., Zhou, J., & Haag-Molkenteller, C. (2013) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.001 · Cited by 416
Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial of Mirabegron in Patients with Overactive Bladder
Nitti, V. W., Auerbach, S., Martin, N., Calhoun, A., Lee, M., & Herschorn, S. (2013) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.017 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Sexton, C. C., Notte, S. M., Maroulis, C., Dmochowski, R. R., Cardozo, L., Subramanian, D., & Coyne, K. S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2011-04-13
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 567-585
- ISSN
- 1368-5031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144564072
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Persistence and adherence in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome with anticholinergic therapy: a systematic review of the literature: OAB treatment persistence and adherence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02626.x
- The paper
- Sexton, C. C., Notte, S. M., Maroulis, C., Dmochowski, R. R., Cardozo, L., Subramanian, D., & Coyne, K. S. (2011). Persistence and adherence in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome with anticholinergic therapy: a systematic review of the literature: OAB treatment persistence and adherence. International Journal of Clinical Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02626.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.