Cited by 37Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPain Management and Opioid Use

Does Pregabalin (Lyrica®) Help Patients Reduce their Use of Benzodiazepines? A Comparison with Gabapentin using the Norwegian Prescription Database

Open access
Bramness, Jørgen G., Sandvik, Pål, Engeland, Anders, Skurtveit, Svetlana·2010·Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology

Abstract

Pregabalin (Lyrica(®) ) may have an anxiolytic effect. It has also been reported that the use of this drug helps prevent excessive use of benzodiazepines. The aim of the present study was to examine if pregabalin reduced the intake of benzodiazepines. In a pharmacoepidemiological study, we compared pregabalin to the older drug gabapentin (Neurontin(®) ) in the Norwegian Prescription Database. The database has total capture of all prescribed drugs outside institutions. We identified all prescriptions for the two drugs for patients aged 18-69 years between 2004 and 2007. Patients were grouped as psychiatric patients, patients with epilepsy, patients with neuropathic pain or non-specified users. We measured the use of benzodiazepines 182 days before and after the initiation of treatment with pregabalin and gabapentin. Between 15% and 29% of the patients were able to stop using benzodiazepines after starting pregabalin or gabapentin treatment. Psychiatric patients who started pregabalin were able to reduce the amount of benzodiazepines used by 48%, compared to only 14% among starters of gabapentin. This study shows that some patients reduced their use of benzodiazepines substantially after starting pregabalin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2010.00590.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing evidence indicates that gabapentin or pregabalin may offer benefits during BZD withdrawal, either by increasing the likelihood of successful discontinuation or by alleviating anxiety and withdrawal-related symptoms.

    “Existing evidence indicates that they may offer benefits during BZD withdrawal, either by increasing the likelihood of successful discontinuation, 87 88 or by alleviating anxiety and withdrawal-related symptoms throughout the tapering process. 89”

    From Z-drug abuse and dependence: Clinical guideline of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology for diagnosis and management (2025) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Discussion reports that 15–29% of patients stopped using benzodiazepines after starting pregabalin or gabapentin, supporting a possible discontinuation benefit. But this prescription-database study does not establish that either drug increased the likelihood of stopping compared with no treatment, or that patients were undergoing a supervised withdrawal. The symptom-relief clause carries a separate citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pregabalin demonstrated superior efficacy and tolerability compared to gabapentin, with 52% of patients achieving BZD-free status after 12 weeks.

    “Pregabalin demonstrated superior efficacy and tolerability compared to gabapentin, with 52% of patients achieving BZD-free status after 12 weeks.”

    From Z-drug abuse and dependence: Clinical guideline of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology for diagnosis and management (2025) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Discussion reports a larger reduction in benzodiazepine consumption among psychiatric patients starting pregabalin than in the other groups, but describes a pregabalin-specific sparing effect as a possible interpretation. It reports that 15–29% stopped using benzodiazepines, not 52%; the study compared use over 182 days, not 12 weeks, and the cited passages do not assess comparative tolerability. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Among psychiatric patients, those treated with pregabalin reduced their BZD consumption by 48%, whereas the reduction was 14% in those treated with gabapentin.

    “Among psychiatric patients, those treated with pregabalin reduced their BZD consumption by 48%, whereas the reduction was of only 14% in those treated with gabapentin. 87”
  • In patients initiating pregabalin or gabapentin for BZD discontinuation, 15 to 29% discontinued BZD use.

    “The findings showed that 15 to 29% of the patients discontinued BZD use after initiating treatment with either agent.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 37

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nutt DJ, Ballenger JC. Anxiety Disorders. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 2003.

Authors
Bramness, J. G., Sandvik, P., Engeland, A., & Skurtveit, S.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Bramness, Jørgen G.
Venue
Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-23
Volume
107
Issue
5
Pages
883-886
ISSN
  • 1742-7835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-7843
OpenAlex
W1720984727
Cited by
37
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
pregabalin, gabapentin, benzodiazepine reduction, benzodiazepine dependence, anxiolytics, psychiatric patients, epilepsy, neuropathic pain, prescribing patterns, drug substitution
MeSH terms
Pregabalin, Gabapentin, Adolescent, Adult, Amines, Benzodiazepines, Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Therapy, Combination, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Humans, Middle Aged, Norway, Drug Prescriptions, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Databases, Factual, Drug Utilization Review, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review