Cited by 135Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsDupuytren's Contracture and Treatments

A surgical algorithm for men with combined Peyronie's disease and erectile dysfunction: functional and satisfaction outcomes

Mulhall, John, Anderson, Matthew, Parker, Marilyn·2005·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

Introduction Men with Peyronie's disease who also have erectile dysfunction represent a challenge to the urologist. Historically, penile prosthesis surgery has been the management strategy of choice for this population. This study was undertaken to define the outcomes of a penile reconstructive surgery algorithm in men with Peyronie's disease and concomitant erectile dysfunction (ED). Methods Patients presenting with combined Peyronie's disease and erectile dysfunction were treated with vasoactive therapy initially. All patients underwent dynamic infusion cavernosometry and cavernosography. Nonresponders to erectogenic pharmacotherapy were advised to undergo penile prosthetic surgery. Responders to erectogenic therapy were considered candidates for either corporoplasty or plaque incision and grafting. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire was used to compare erectile function and satisfaction profiles serially pre- and postoperatively between the patients in the three groups. Results Sixty-two patients constituted the study population. Eighty-one percent of the patients responded to erectogenic pharmacotherapy. Postoperative IIEF erectile function domain scores were statistically higher for implant patients and lower for plaque incision and grafting patients compared to preoperative scores. Postoperative IIEF satisfaction domain scores were higher for corporoplasty and implant patients and lower for plaque incision and grafting patients compared to…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20113.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mulhall, J., Anderson, M., & Parker, M.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Loyola University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Mulhall, John
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2005-01-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
132-138
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W2155176871
Cited by
135
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments
Keywords
Peyronie's disease, erectile dysfunction, penile prosthesis, corporoplasty, surgical algorithm, vasoactive therapy, cavernosography, International Index of Erectile Function, patient satisfaction, erectile function outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Penile Induration, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male, Penile Prosthesis, Matched-Pair Analysis, Patient Selection, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review