Cited by 59Urological Disorders and TreatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studiesDupuytren's Contracture and Treatments

Urologist Practice Patterns in the Management of Peyronie's Disease: A Nationwide Survey

Shindel, Alan W., Bullock, Travis L., Brandes, Steven·2008·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

Introduction Peyronie's disease (PD) is a poorly understood clinical entity. Aim. We endeavored to determine how contemporary urologists in the United States manage PD. Methods A randomly generated mailing list of 996 practicing urologists was generated from the American Urologic Association member directory. A specifically designed survey was mailed with a cover letter and a postage-paid return envelope. Main outcome measure Our survey assessed several practice-related factors and asked questions of how the subject would manage various presentations of PD in their practice. Four cases were presented: case 1, a healthy 55-year-old man with painless 30 degrees dorsal curvature of 16 months duration; case 2, a 60-year-old man with 35 degrees dorsal curvature, 4/10 pain on visual analog scale, of 6 months duration; case 3, a 62-year-old man with painless 60 degrees dorsal curvature and erectile dysfunction responsive to alprostadil suppository of 2 years duration; and case 4, a 50-year-old man with mid-shaft waist deformity, foreshortening, no pain/curvature/erectile dysfunction. Results Responses were received from 236 (24%) practicing urologists. Vitamin E was the preferred initial management for 70% of respondents, with observation, Potaba (Glenwood, Englewood, New Jersey, USA), colchicine, verapamil injections, and verapamil gel favored by 32, 20, 12, 7, and 10% of respondents, respectively. Fifty-seven percent of respondents performed surgery for PD, with penile prostheses,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00674.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shindel, A. W., Bullock, T. L., & Brandes, S.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Shindel, Alan W.
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2008-04-01
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
954-964
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W2160805588
Cited by
59
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments
Keywords
Peyronie's disease, urologist practice patterns, penile curvature, erectile dysfunction, penile prosthesis, Nesbit procedure, plication, vitamin E, colchicine, prostaglandin E1, penile deformity
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Penile Induration, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Professional-Patient Relations, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, United States, Urology, Vitamin E, Penile Prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review