Cited by 279Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyMarriage and Sexual Relationships

Sexual Dysfunction among Older Adults: Prevalence and Risk Factors from a Nationally Representative U.S. Probability Sample of Men and Women 57–85 Years of Age

Open access
Laumann, Edward O., Waite, Linda J.·2008·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Despite increasing demand for clinical interventions into sexual problems in an aging population, epidemiological data on the subject are scarce. Aims: To examine the prevalence of sexual problems across different sociodemographic groups, and risk factors for these problems in multiple domains of life. Methods: Statistical analysis of data from the 2005–2006 National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP), a nationally representative U.S. probability sample of 1,550 women and 1,455 men aged 57–85 at the time of interview. Main Outcome Measures: Likelihood of experiencing sexual dysfunction in the preceding 12 months. Results: Sexual problems among the elderly are not an inevitable consequence of aging, but instead are responses to the presence of stressors in multiple life domains. This impact may partly be gender differentiated, with older women's sexual health more sensitive to their physical health than is true for men. The mechanism linking life stress with sexual problems is likely to be poor mental health and relationship dissatisfaction. The NSHAP results demonstrate the consistent impact of poor mental health on women's reports of sexual problems and the less consistent association with men's problems. Conclusion: The results point to a need for physicians who are treating older adults experiencing sexual problems to take into account not simply their physical health, but also their psychosocial health and satisfaction with their intimate relationship.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00974.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the past few years, a number of well-publicized studies have investigated the sexual activity of those as old as 94.

    “In the past few years, however, a number of well-publicized studies have investigated the sexual activity of those as old as 94.”

    From Medicalization and the Refashioning of Age-Related Limits on Sexuality (2012) · cites this paper as Laumann, Das, & Waite, 2008

    The Introduction discusses studies of sexual activity and sexual problems among older adults, and the Methods describe this study’s sample of adults aged 57–85. Our copy does not substantiate the claim that the studies investigated people as old as 94 or that they were well-publicized. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [1]Laumann EO Paik A Rosen RC Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors JAMA 1999 281 537 44 10022110
  2. [3]Hirsch M Donatucci C Glina S Montague D Montorsi F Wyllie M Standards for clinical trials in male sexual dysfunction: Erectile dysfunction and rapid ejaculation J Sex Med 2004 1 87 91 16422988
  3. [4]DeLamater J Sexual desire in later life J Sex Res 2005 42 138 49 16123844
  4. [6]Clayton AH Epidemiology and neurobiology of female sexual dysfunction J Sex Med 2007 4 4 suppl 260 8 17958618
  5. [7]Derogatis LR Burnett AL The epidemiology of sexual dysfunctions J Sex Med 2008 5 289 300 18004994
  6. [8]Parish WL Laumann EO Pan S Hao Y Sexual dysfunctions in urban China: A population-based national survey of men and women J Sex Med 2007 4 1559 74 17888072
  7. [9]Lindau ST Laumann EO Levinson W Waite LJ Synthesis of scientific disciplines in pursuit of health: The Interactive Biopsychosocial Model Perspect Biol Med 2003 46 3 suppl S74 86 14563076 PMC1201376
  8. [10]Feldman HA Goldstein I Hatzichristou DG Krane RJ McKinlay JB Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: Results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study J Urol 1994 151 54 61 8254833
  9. [11]Panser LA Rhodes T Girman CJ Guess HA Chute CG Oesterling JE Lieber MM Jacobsen SJ Sexual function of men ages 40 to 79 years: The Olmsted county study of urinary symptoms and health status among men J Am Geriatr Soc 1995 43 1107 11 7560700
  10. [12]Blanker MH Bosch R Groeneveld F Bohnen AM Prins AD Thomas S Hop W Erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction in a community-based sample of men 50 to 78 years old: Prevalence, concern, and relation to sexual activity Urology 2001 57 763 8 11306400
  11. [16]Laumann EO Gagnon JH Michael RT Michaels S The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press 1994
  12. [21]Basson R Berman J Burnett A Derogatis L Ferguson D Fourcroy J Goldstein I Graziottin A Heiman J Laan E Leiblum S Padma-Nathan H Rosen R Segraves K Segraves RT Shabsigh R Sipski M Wagner G Whipple B Report of the international consensus development congress on female sexual dysfunction: Definitions and classifications J Urol 2000 163 888 93 10688001
  13. [22]Rosen RC Laumann EO The prevalence of sexual problems in women: How valid are comparisons across studies? Arch Sex Behav 2003 32 209 11 12807293
  14. [23]Shiovitz-Ezra S Leitsch S Graber J Karraker A Quality of life indicators in the National Social Life, Health and Aging Project (NSHAP) J Geron: Soc Sci 2008 in press PMC2800813 19204071
  15. [28]Stata Corp STATA Release 10.0 College Station, TX Stata Press 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laumann, E. O., & Waite, L. J.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Laumann, Edward O.
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2008-10-01
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
2300-2311
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W2126327043
Cited by
279
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (5R01 AG021487)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Keywords
sexual dysfunction, older adults, prevalence, risk factors, life events, mental health, relationship satisfaction, gender differences, aging, psychosocial health, National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Genital Diseases, Female, Genital Diseases, Male, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, United States, Confidence Intervals, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review