The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RATINGS OF MANAGERIAL CHARACTERISTICS: EVALUATION DIFFICULTY, CO‐WORKER AGREEMENT, AND SELF‐AWARENESS
Abstract
This research examined variables contributing to self‐awareness and coworker agreement on 30 managerial characteristics. The first study collected data from 233 management students on the difficulty of rating different characteristics. It also developed reliable measures of self‐protection mechanisms that may negatively influence self‐awareness. Four self‐protection factors were identified: Denial, Giving Up, Self‐Promotion, and Fear of Failure. The second study collected self‐, supervisor, peer, and subordinate ratings of the managerial characteristics to derive multiple measures of self‐awareness. There was a total of 283 co‐worker ratings for 36 target middle managers. The results showed that within‐sample co‐worker disagreement measures from Study 2 were higher for items that were perceived by the sample in Study 1 as more difficult to rate. Self‐ratings were more highly related to the average of co‐worker ratings than to the ratings provided by any one co‐worker alone. Co‐workers' ratings of the target's use of self‐protection mechanisms were negatively associated with self‐awareness measures. Ideas are discussed for other correlates of self‐awareness and ways to enhance the value of feedback processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Urbina, S. (2014) · doi:10.1002/9781394259458 · Cited by 1,845
Cited by
A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
Hinkin, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639502100509 · Cited by 3,193
Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings.
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.557 · Cited by 505
Business accomplishments, gender and entrepreneurial self-image
Verheul, I., Uhlaner, L., & Thurik, R. (2005) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.03.002 · Cited by 228
Seeing eye to eye: A meta-analysis of self-other agreement of leadership
Lee, A., & Carpenter, N. C. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.06.002 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- WOHLERS, A. I., & LONDON, M.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-261
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2161537927
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.