Cited by 53Cognitive Abilities and TestingCompetency Development and EvaluationSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Exploring Black-White subgroup differences of managerial competencies

GOLDSTEIN, HAROLD W., YUSKO, KENNETH P., NICOLOPOULOS, VASILIKI·2001·Personnel Psychology

Abstract

This study investigates whether different job‐relevant competencies vary in terms of Black‐White subgroup differences exhibited. There were 633 participants (545 Whites, 88 Blacks) who completed a managerial assessment center that evaluated 13 competency dimensions across 8 assessment exercises. Participants also completed a cognitive ability test. The results suggest that subgroup differences vary by the content domain of the competency. As predicted, significant subgroup differences emerged for a majority of the more cognitively loaded competencies (e.g., judgment) while nonsignificant differences were associated with a majority of the less cognitively loaded competencies (e.g., human relations). Furthermore, when cognitive ability was controlled, 12 of 13 competency scores demonstrated incremental validity in predicting supervisory job performance ratings. In addition, competencies with greater cognitive load tended to more strongly predict cognitive aspects of job performance as compared to noncognitive aspects. However, competencies with less cognitive load did not differentially predict cognitive and noncognitive aspects of job performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00232.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Goldstein, Yusko, and Nicolopoulos concluded that clear group differences emerged for more cognitively-loaded managerial competencies and much smaller differences for less cognitively-loaded competencies.

    “Goldstein, Yusko, and Nicolopoulos [10] concluded that clear group differences emerged for a majority of more cognitively-loaded managerial competencies, such as judgment, whereas much smaller differences were associated with the majority of the less cognitively-loaded competencies, such as human relations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GOLDSTEIN, H. W., YUSKO, K. P., & NICOLOPOULOS, V.
Affiliations
Baruch College (US)
Corresponding author
GOLDSTEIN, HAROLD W.
Venue
Personnel Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
783-807
ISSN
  • 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6570
OpenAlex
W2124923642
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personnel Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Competency Development and Evaluation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
managerial competencies, assessment centers, cognitive ability, cognitive load, incremental validity, job performance prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review