The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE CALCULATION OF THE DOSAGE‐MORTALITY CURVE
Abstract
Summary.: The sigmoid dosage‐mortality curve, secured so commonly in toxicity tests upon multicellular organisms, is interpreted as a cumulative normal frequency distribution of the variation among the individuals of a population in their susceptibility to a toxic agent, which susceptibility is inversely proportional to the logarithm of the dose applied. In support of this interpretation is the fact that when dosage is inferred from the observed mortality on the assumption that susceptibility is distributed normally, such inferred dosages, in terms of units called probits, give straight lines when plotted against the logarithm of their corresponding observed dosages. It is shown that this use of the logarithm of the dosage can be interpreted in terms either of the Weber‐Fechner law or of the amount of poison fixed by the tissues of the organism. How this transformation to a straight regression line facilitates the precise estimation of the dosage‐mortality relationship and its accuracy is considered in detail. Statistical methods are described for taking account of tests which result in 0 or 100 per cent, kill, for giving each determination a weight proportional to its reliability, for computing the position and slope of the transformed dosage‐mortality curve, for measuring the goodness of fit of the regression line to the observations by the X 2 test, and for calculating the error in position and in slope and their combined effect at any log. dosage. The terminology and procedures are consistent with those used by R. A. Fisher, who has contributed an appendix on the case of zero survivors. Except for a table of common logarithms, all the tables required to utilise the methods described are given either in the present paper or in Fisher's book. A numerical example selected from Strand's experiments upon Tribolium confusum with carbon disulphide has been worked out in detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Research Workers.
Grove, C. C., & Fisher, R. A. (1930) · The American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2299007 · Cited by 1,349
Bliss, C. I. (1934) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.79.2037.38 · Cited by 697
Self-citationH., F. Z. (1932) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj1932.00021962002400120011x · Cited by 515
Applications of the Theory of Error to the Interpretation of Trends
Working, H., & Hotelling, H. (1929) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1929.10506274 · Cited by 231
The mode of action of drugs on cells
Munch, J. C. (1933) · The Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (1912) · doi:10.1002/jps.3080220628 · Cited by 125
THE CRITERION OF GOODNESS OF FIT OF PSYCHOPHYSICAL CURVES
Thomson, G. H. (1919) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/12.3-4.216 · Cited by 11
Cited by
THE TOXICITY OF POISONS APPLIED JOINTLY1
BLISS, C. I. (1939) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1939.tb06990.x · Cited by 2,419
Self-citationThe Effect of Environmental Factors on the Physiology of Fish
FRY, F. E. J. (1971) · Fish Physiology · doi:10.1016/s1546-5098(08)60146-6 · Cited by 1,783
Berkson, J. (1953) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1953.10483494 · Cited by 441
Gonino, G. M. R., Figueiredo, B. R. S., Manetta, G. I., Zaia Alves, G. H., & Benedito, E. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.022 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- BLISS, C. I.
- Venue
- Annals of Applied Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1935-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 134-167
- ISSN
- 0003-4746 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7348
- OpenAlex
- W2088844710
- Cited by
- 1,123
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 19.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE CALCULATION OF THE DOSAGE‐MORTALITY CURVE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1935.tb07713.x
- The paper
- BLISS, C. I. (1935). THE CALCULATION OF THE DOSAGE‐MORTALITY CURVE. Annals of Applied Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1935.tb07713.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.