The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stay‐green: A consequence of the balance between supply and demand for nitrogen during grain filling?
Abstract
Summary: Retention of green leaf area in grain sorghum under post‐anthesis drought, known as stay‐green, is associated with greater biomass production, lodging resistance and yield. The stay‐green phenomenon can be examined at a cell, leaf, or whole plant level. At a cell level, the retention of chloroplast proteins such as LHCP2, OEC33 and Rubisco until late in senescence has been reported in sorghum containing the KS19 source of stay‐green, indicating that photosynthesis may be maintained for longer during senescence in these genotypes. At a leaf level, longevity of photosynthetic apparatus is intimately related to nitrogen (N) status. At a whole plant level, stay‐green can be viewed as a consequence of the balance between N demand by the grain and N supply during grain filling. To examine some of these concepts, nine hybrids varying in the B35 and KS19 sources of stay‐green were grown under a post‐anthesis water deficit. Genotypic variation in delayed onset and reduced rate of leaf senescence were explained by differences in specific leaf nitrogen (SLN) and N uptake during grain filling. Matching N supply from age‐related senescence and N uptake during grain filling with grain N demand found that the shortfall in N supply for grain filling was greater in the senescent than stay‐green hybrids, resulting in more accelerated leaf senescence in the former. We hypothesise that increased N uptake by stay‐green hybrids is a result of greater biomass accumulation during grain filling in response to increased sink demand (higher grain numbers) which, in turn, is the result of increased radiation use efficiency and transpiration efficiency due to higher SLN. Delayed leaf senescence resulting from higher SLN should, in turn, allow more carbon and nitrogen to be allocated to the roots of stay‐green hybrids during grain filling, thereby maintaining a greater capacity to extract N from the soil compared with senescent hybrids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hammer, G. L., Dong, Z., McLean, G., Doherty, A., Messina, C., Schussler, J., Zinselmeier, C., Paszkiewicz, S., & Cooper, M. (2009) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0152 · Cited by 745
Self-citationQuantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?: Table I.
Collins, N. C., Tardieu, F., & Tuberosa, R. (2008) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.108.118117 · Cited by 559
Adapting APSIM to model the physiology and genetics of complex adaptive traits in field crops
Hammer, G. L., van Oosterom, E., McLean, G., Chapman, S. C., Broad, I., Harland, P., & Muchow, R. C. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq095 · Cited by 367
Self-citationNitrogen and water resources commonly limit crop yield increases, not necessarily plant genetics
Sinclair, T. R., & Rufty, T. W. (2012) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2012.07.001 · Cited by 344
Leaf nitrogen remobilisation for plant development and grain filling
Masclaux‐Daubresse, C., Reisdorf‐Cren, M., & Orsel, M. (2008) · Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00097.x · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- BORRELL, A., HAMMER, G., & VAN OOSTEROM, E.
- Venue
- Annals of Applied Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-95
- ISSN
- 0003-4746 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7348
- OpenAlex
- W2081151958
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stay‐green: A consequence of the balance between supply and demand for nitrogen during grain filling? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00088.x
- The paper
- BORRELL, A., HAMMER, G., & VAN OOSTEROM, E. (2001). Stay‐green: A consequence of the balance between supply and demand for nitrogen during grain filling? Annals of Applied Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00088.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.