Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Stay‐green: A consequence of the balance between supply and demand for nitrogen during grain filling?

BORRELL, ANDREW, HAMMER, GRAEME, VAN OOSTEROM, ERIK·2001·Annals of Applied Biology

Abstract

Summary: Retention of green leaf area in grain sorghum under post‐anthesis drought, known as stay‐green, is associated with greater biomass production, lodging resistance and yield. The stay‐green phenomenon can be examined at a cell, leaf, or whole plant level. At a cell level, the retention of chloroplast proteins such as LHCP2, OEC33 and Rubisco until late in senescence has been reported in sorghum containing the KS19 source of stay‐green, indicating that photosynthesis may be maintained for longer during senescence in these genotypes. At a leaf level, longevity of photosynthetic apparatus is intimately related to nitrogen (N) status. At a whole plant level, stay‐green can be viewed as a consequence of the balance between N demand by the grain and N supply during grain filling. To examine some of these concepts, nine hybrids varying in the B35 and KS19 sources of stay‐green were grown under a post‐anthesis water deficit. Genotypic variation in delayed onset and reduced rate of leaf senescence were explained by differences in specific leaf nitrogen (SLN) and N uptake during grain filling. Matching N supply from age‐related senescence and N uptake during grain filling with grain N demand found that the shortfall in N supply for grain filling was greater in the senescent than stay‐green hybrids, resulting in more accelerated leaf senescence in the former. We hypothesise that increased N uptake by stay‐green hybrids is a result of greater biomass accumulation during grain filling in response to increased sink demand (higher grain numbers) which, in turn, is the result of increased radiation use efficiency and transpiration efficiency due to higher SLN. Delayed leaf senescence resulting from higher SLN should, in turn, allow more carbon and nitrogen to be allocated to the roots of stay‐green hybrids during grain filling, thereby maintaining a greater capacity to extract N from the soil compared with senescent hybrids.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00088.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
BORRELL, A., HAMMER, G., & VAN OOSTEROM, E.
Venue
Annals of Applied Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-02
Volume
138
Issue
1
Pages
91-95
ISSN
  • 0003-4746 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7348
OpenAlex
W2081151958
Cited by
311
References
0
FWCI
8.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stay‐green: A consequence of the balance between supply and demand for nitrogen during grain filling? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00088.x
The paper
BORRELL, A., HAMMER, G., & VAN OOSTEROM, E. (2001). Stay‐green: A consequence of the balance between supply and demand for nitrogen during grain filling? Annals of Applied Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2001.tb00088.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.