Sources of Assimilated Proteins in Old and New World Phytophagous Bats: Nitrogen Sources of Phytophagus Bats
Abstract
Dietary proteins are considered crucial for growth and maintenance in mammals, but many fruit-eating mammals feed largely on a protein-poor diet. In the Chiroptera, frugivory has evolved twice, in the Old World Pteropodidae and in the New World Phyllostomidae, especially the Stenodermatinae. Recent studies based on the analysis of nitrogen isotope ratios (δ¹⁵N) suggest that phyllostomids feed to varying degrees on arthropods to meet their nitrogen (N) requirements. Arthropod feeding has rarely been observed in Pteropodidae. Thus, we asked whether pteropodids meet their N requirements by feeding exclusively on plant matter. We predicted that tissue from pteropodid wing membranes should be depleted in ¹⁵N relative to those of obligate insectivorous rhinolophoid, vespertilionid or emballonurid bats, if pteropodids acquire proteins exclusively from fruits, leaves or nectar. We found that δ¹⁵N in pteropodids were significantly lower than in obligate insectivorous bats. In addition, mean δ¹⁵N of Old World pteropodids was similar to that of obligate frugivorous stenodermatines of the New World tropics. We infer from these data that pteropodids are predominantly phytophagous bats. From a nutritional perspective, pteropodids and stenodermatines are very similar, suggesting that they share convergent physiological adaptations to compensate for the lack of dietary nitrogen.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fruit bats' specialized diet consists predominantly of sugars and very little fat and protein.
“The second challenge faced by fruit bats is the nutritional composition of their specialized diet, consisting predominantly of sugars and very little fat and protein36.”
From A genomics approach reveals insights into the importance of gene losses for mammalian adaptations (2018) · cites this paper as [36]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A genomics approach reveals insights into the importance of gene losses for mammalian adaptations
Sharma, V., Hecker, N., Roscito, J. G., Foerster, L., Langer, B. E., & Hiller, M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03667-1 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
- Authors
- Voigt, C. C., Zubaid, A., Kunz, T. H., & Kingston, T.
- Affiliations
- Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (DE)
- National University of Malaysia (MY)
- Boston University (US)
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Voigt, Christian C.
- Venue
- Biotropica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02-22
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 108-113
- ISSN
- 0006-3606 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1592352056
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biotropica (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- Pteropodidae, Phyllostomidae, Stenodermatinae, frugivory, dietary protein, nitrogen isotope ratios, nitrogen requirements, convergent evolution, Old World bats, New World bats, bats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review