Cited by 102Cassava research and cyanidePlant nutrient uptake and metabolismPlant Molecular Biology Research

Expression Profiling of Cassava Storage Roots Reveals an Active Process of Glycolysis/GluconeogenesisF

Yang, Jun, An, Dong, Zhang, Peng·2011·Journal of Integrative Plant Biology

Abstract

Mechanisms related to the development of cassava storage roots and starch accumulation remain largely unknown. To evaluate genome‐wide expression patterns during tuberization, a 60 mer oligonucleotide microarray representing 20 840 cassava genes was designed to identify differentially expressed transcripts in fibrous roots, developing storage roots and mature storage roots. Using a random variance model and the traditional twofold change method for statistical analysis, 912 and 3 386 upregulated and downregulated genes related to the three developmental phases were identified. Among 25 significantly changed pathways identified, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis was the most evident one. Rate‐limiting enzymes were identified from each individual pathway, for example, enolase, L‐lactate dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase for glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, and ADP‐glucose pyrophosphorylase, starch branching enzyme and glucan phosphorylase for sucrose and starch metabolism. This study revealed that dynamic changes in at least 16% of the total transcripts, including transcription factors, oxidoreductases/transferases/hydrolases, hormone‐related genes, and effectors of homeostasis. The reliability of these differentially expressed genes was verified by quantitative real‐time reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction. These studies should facilitate our understanding of the storage root formation and cassava improvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.01018.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, J., An, D., & Zhang, P.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Peng
Venue
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-25
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
193-211
ISSN
  • 0577-7496 (ISSN-L)
  • 1672-9072
  • 1744-7909
OpenAlex
W1563103142
Cited by
102
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Integrative Plant Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Cassava research and cyanide
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
cassava, storage root development, tuberization, starch accumulation, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, differentially expressed genes, gene expression profiling, sucrose metabolism, ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, starch branching enzyme, enolase, L-lactate dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase, transcription factors, hormone-related genes
MeSH terms
Manihot, Gluconeogenesis, Glycolysis, Plant Proteins, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Plant Roots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review