The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Test Theory Reconceived
Abstract
Educational test theory consists of statistical and methodological tools to support inference about examinees’ knowledge, skills, and accomplishments. Its evolution has been shaped by the nature of users’ inferences, which have been framed almost exclusively in terms of trait and behavioral psychology, and focused on students’ tendency to act in prespecified ways in prespecified domains of tasks. Progress in the methodology of test theory enabled users to extend the range of inference and ground interpretations more solidly within these psychological paradigms. Developments in cognitive and developmental psychology have broadened the range of inferences we wish to make about students’ learning to encompass conjectures about the nature and acquisition of their knowledge. The same underlying principles of inference that led to standard test theory can support inference in this broader universe of discourse. Familiar models and methods‐sometimes extended, sometimes reinterpreted, sometimes applied to problems wholly different from those for which they were first devised‐can play a useful role to this end.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The proof and measurement of association between two things
Spearman, C. (1904) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1412159 · Cited by 8,039
Cited by
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores
Kane, M. T. (2013) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/jedm.12000 · Cited by 2,110
Leighton, J. P., Gierl, M. J., & Hunka, S. M. (2004) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2004.tb01163.x · Cited by 391
Construct‐Irrelevant Variance in High‐Stakes Testing
Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (2004) · Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2004.tb00149.x · Cited by 386
Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression
Wilson, M. (2009) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20318 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Mislevy, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Measurement
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 379-416
- ISSN
- 0022-0655 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3984
- OpenAlex
- W2135167102
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Test Theory Reconceived. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1996.tb00498.x
- The paper
- Mislevy, R. J. (1996). Test Theory Reconceived. Journal of Educational Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1996.tb00498.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.