The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance‐Based Assessment: Implications of Task Specificity
Abstract
How generalizable are the scores from performance‐based assessments? How can we best increase the gener‐alizability of results? What level of generalizability is needed for different testing purposes?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In generalizability theory (Gtheory), reliability is analyzed in terms of the effects of various measurement facets on estimates of performance [80].”
From Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present (2013) · cites this paper as [80]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Brief History of Nearly Everything from the 1970s to the Present
Tindal, G. (2013) · ISRN Education · doi:10.1155/2013/958530 · Cited by 59
“These three facets are most typically studied in G-theory; however, the consistent finding is that raters are rarely influential whereas tasks are nearly always influential [81].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Linn, R. L., & Burton, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Venue
- Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-8
- ISSN
- 0731-1745 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3992
- OpenAlex
- W2086481969
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2021: 39 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 14.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Measurement Issues and Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- performance-based assessment, task specificity, test score validity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review