The DOI matches its Crossref record.
INFECTIVE DOSE OF FOODBORNE PATHOGENS IN VOLUNTEERS: A REVIEW
Abstract
Risk assessment and impact of foodborne pathogens on the health of different populations was one of the goals identified in the Presidential Food Safety Initiative three‐year plan. This entailed estimation of dose‐response relationship for foodborne pathogens to humans, either by feeding studies or from outbreaks. For certain pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli O157:H7, there are no feeding studies due to ethical reasons, and the results from outbreaks are normally used to estimate the infectious dose. The focus of this review is to compile dose‐response information in volunteers for several foodborne pathogens including Salmonella, Shigella spp., Campylobacter jejuni, Vibrio spp., Escherichia coli, Cryptosporidium parvum and Entamoeba coli. The infectious dose for different serovars of Salmonella and strains of E. coli was quite large (> 10 5 organisms), while the infectious dose for some Shigella spp. seemed to be as low as less than 10 organisms. Toxigenic V. cholerae (O1 and O139 serotypes) were infective at a dose of 10 4 organisms; a non‐O1 strain was infective at a much higher dose (10 6 organisms). C. jejuni, C. parvum and Entamoeba coli appeared to have infectious doses as low as 500 organisms, 10 oocysts, and 1 cyst, respectively. The infectious dose and the dose response are dependent upon the strains used, and the age and physical condition of the individuals, and can therefore show wide variations. In addition, since many of the volunteer studies are carried out by feeding the organisms in a nonfood matrix after neutralizing the stomach acidity, results obtained may not reflect the true dose response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Self-destructive cooperation mediated by phenotypic noise
Ackermann, M., Stecher, B., Freed, N. E., Songhet, P., Hardt, W.-D., & Doebeli, M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07067 · Cited by 428
Mechanisms of survival, responses and sources of Salmonella in low-moisture environments
Finn, S., Condell, O., McClure, P., Amézquita, A., & Fanning, S. (2013) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00331 · Cited by 398
Biosensing using dynamic-mode cantilever sensors: A review
Johnson, B. N., & Mutharasan, R. (2012) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2011.10.054 · Cited by 314
(2022) · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.772892 · Cited by 30
Hoffmann, V., Simiyu, S., Sewell, D., Tsai, K., Cumming, O., Mumma, J., & Baker, K. K. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.08.24.20181222 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- KOTHARY, M. H., & BABU, U. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Food Safety
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-68
- ISSN
- 0149-6085 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-4565
- OpenAlex
- W2151004546
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: INFECTIVE DOSE OF FOODBORNE PATHOGENS IN VOLUNTEERS: A REVIEW. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-4565.2001.tb00307.x
- The paper
- KOTHARY, M. H., & BABU, U. S. (2001). INFECTIVE DOSE OF FOODBORNE PATHOGENS IN VOLUNTEERS: A REVIEW. Journal of Food Safety. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4565.2001.tb00307.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.