The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE VIGNETTE IN A SCENARIO-BASED ROLE-PLAYING EXPERIMENT: Vignette in an SBRP Experiment
Abstract
A scenario-based role-playing experiment is well suited for research seeking to understand how and why operations and supply chain managers, when dealing with complex issues, form their judgments and preferences or make the decisions that they do. As a method for data collection, a scenario-based role-playing experiment deploys varying versions of a descriptive vignette to convey scripted information about specific levels of factors of interest that are hypothesized, upfront, to influence judgments, preferences or decisions. Human subjects are recruited to assume an a priori defined role and, in this role, to then form their judgments and preferences or make their decisions in response to the scripted information conveyed in at least one version of the vignette. For these judgments, preferences or decisions to be useful for subsequent statistical analyses, the vignette and its varying versions to be deployed in a scenario-based role-playing experiment must be appropriately designed (i.e., written and presented) and validated. This commentary speaks to this “vignette design and validation” issue and prescribes a three-stage process to create a vignette with its derivative versions that is clear, realistic, complete (in that it contains all information necessary for human subjects to assume their role and to consequently provide their reactions and responses), and is effective (in that it cues human subjects to perceive the desired levels of the factors of interest).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait, J. D., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 4,595
Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract
Robinson, S. L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393868 · Cited by 2,991
Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships?
Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299205600203 · Cited by 2,411
Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/0022051043004577 · Cited by 2,099
The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research
Alexander, C. S., & Becker, H. J. (1978) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/268432 · Cited by 1,169
Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy
Walters, K. D., & Preston, L. E. (1982) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257239 · Cited by 969
Handbook of Organizational Measurement
Aldrich, B. C., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1989) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/1317948 · Cited by 960
Bradburn, N. M., Sudman, S., & Wansink, B. C. (2004) · Cited by 794
Determinants of Perceived Web Site Interactivity
Song, J. H., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2008) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.2.99 · Cited by 662
Cited by
Confente, I., Russo, I., Peinkofer, S., & Frankel, R. (2021) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-03-2020-0089 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- RUNGTUSANATHAM, M., WALLIN, C., & ECKERD, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Supply Chain Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 9-16
- ISSN
- 1055-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-2409
- OpenAlex
- W1917355616
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 17.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE VIGNETTE IN A SCENARIO-BASED ROLE-PLAYING EXPERIMENT: Vignette in an SBRP Experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-493x.2011.03232.x
- The paper
- RUNGTUSANATHAM, M., WALLIN, C., & ECKERD, S. (2011). THE VIGNETTE IN A SCENARIO-BASED ROLE-PLAYING EXPERIMENT: Vignette in an SBRP Experiment. Journal of Supply Chain Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493x.2011.03232.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.