Cited by 7Spatial and Cultural StudiesCinema History and CriticismCinema and Media Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Screening Singapore: The Cinematic Landscape of Eric Khoo's Be With Me

LAW, L., WEE, C.J.W.-L., MCMULLAN, F.·2011·Geographical Research

Abstract

This paper investigates the mutually constitutive relationship between the context of film production and the composition and content of images produced. Singapore film director Eric Khoo is central to our investigation, and his 2005 film Be With Me is a key example of how Singapore's ongoing urban redevelopment to become a world city reflexively shapes the style and appearance of the city-state projected in the film. Singapore's history as a developmental state, its pervasive influence on the public and private spaces of its citizens, and recent state-led initiatives to nurture the arts and media sectors all make it an ideal site to examine the relations between the cinema and space. Be With Me also lends itself to spatial analysis as its mise-en-scène is a geography of the life course: particular parts of the city are ‘cast’ as spaces of youth, middle, and old age. We elaborate how the landscapes deployed in the film are simultaneously constituted through state policies, mise-en-scène, and gender/age/class considerations. In so doing we show how Khoo's vision of the city-state has altered since his emergence as a film director in the 1990s: from an oppressed site of hyper-modernity to a more ambivalent ‘globalised’ built environment in which marginalised or liminal urban spaces for sensuous life and hope for human connection can be experienced.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2011.00717.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Aquilia, 2006, Westernising Southeast Asia cinema: co-productions for ‘transnational’ markets, Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 20, 433, 10.1080/10304310600987254 · DOI
  2. Berger, 1972, Ways of Seeing
  3. Chan, 2008, When is a foreign-language film not a foreign-language film? When it has too much English in it: the case of a Singapore film and the Oscars, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 9, 97, 10.1080/14649370701789682 · DOI
  4. Chang, 2000, Renaissance revisited: Singapore as a ‘Global City for the Arts’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24, 818, 10.1111/1468-2427.00280 · DOI
  5. Chang, 2003, Renaissance city Singapore: a study of arts spaces, Area, 35, 128, 10.1111/1475-4762.00155 · DOI
  6. Christophers, 2009, Envisioning Media Power: On Capital and Geographies of Television, 10.5771/9780739133101 · DOI
  7. Christopherson, 2009, The creative economy as ‘big business’: evaluating strategies to lure filmmakers, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29, 336, 10.1177/0739456X09354381 · DOI
  8. Chua, 2003, Life Is Not Complete without Shopping: Consumption Culture in Singapore
  9. Chua, 2003, Singapore cinema: Eric Khoo and Jack Neo - critique from the margins and the mainstream, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 4, 117, 10.1080/1464937032000060258 · DOI
  10. 1997, The Cinematic City
  11. Coe, 2000, The view from out West: embeddedness, inter-personal relations and the development of an indigenous film industry in Vancouver, Geoforum, 31, 391, 10.1016/S0016-7185(00)00005-1 · DOI
  12. Cresswell, 2002, Engaging film: Geographies of mobility and identity
  13. da Costa, 2003, Cultural Geography in Practice, 191
  14. De, 2002a, Masculinity, community and time in Singaporean cinema, Emergences, 12, 199, 10.1080/10457220216365 · DOI
  15. De, 2002b, Trans-Status Subjects: Gender in the Globalization of South and Southeast Asia, 189
  16. Fitzmaurice, 2001, Cinema and the city, 19, 10.1002/9780470712948.ch2 · DOI
  17. Florida, 2002, The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life
  18. Gilroy, 2006, Postcolonial Melancholia
  19. Goh, 2001, Ideologies of ‘upgrading’ in Singapore public housing: postmodern style, globalisation and class construction in the built environment, Urban Studies, 38, 1589, 10.1080/00420980120076821 · DOI
  20. Graham, 2002, Reproducing the Asian family across the generations: ‘tradition’,gender and expectations in Singapore, Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 17, 61, 10.18356/b8413168-en · DOI
  21. Harper, 2010, Cinema and Landscape
  22. Heng, 2010, Management of Success: Singapore Revisited, 521
  23. Jancovich, 2003, The Place of the Audience: Cultural Geographies of Film Consumption
  24. Khoo, 2005, Slang images: on ‘foreignness’ of contemporary Singaporean films, Asia Research Institute Working Paper Series, 40, 2
  25. Kong, 2000, Cultural policy in Singapore: negotiating economic and socio-cultural agendas, Geoforum, 31, 409, 10.1016/S0016-7185(00)00006-3 · DOI
  26. Kong, 2003, The Politics of Landscapes in Singapore: Constructions of ‘Nation’
  27. Kong, 1996, Singapore and the experience of place in old age, Geographical Review, 86, 529, 10.2307/215931 · DOI
  28. Laine, 2006, Cinema as second skin, New Review of Film and Television Studies, 4, 93, 10.1080/17400300600768414 · DOI
  29. Law, 2005, Introducing Human Geographies, 439
  30. Law, 2007, The Beach, the gaze and film tourism, Tourist Studies, 7, 145, 10.1177/1468797607083499 · DOI
  31. Lazar, 2000, Gender, discourse and semiotics: the politics of parenthood representations, Discourse and Society, 11, 373, 10.1177/0957926500011003005 · DOI
  32. Lefebvre, 2006, Landscape and Film
  33. Lim, 2004, Where love dares (not) speak its name: the expression of homosexuality in Singapore, Urban Studies, 41, 1759, 10.1080/0042098042000243147 · DOI
  34. Lukinbeal, 2004a, The map that precedes the territory, GeoJournal, 59, 247, 10.1023/B:GEJO.0000026698.99658.53 · DOI
  35. Lukinbeal, 2004b, The rise of regional film production centres in North America, 1984-1997, GeoJournal, 59, 307, 10.1023/B:GEJO.0000026704.17447.7a · DOI
  36. Lukinbeal, 2005, Cinematic landscapes, Journal of Cultural Geography, 23, 3, 10.1080/08873630509478229 · DOI
  37. Marks, 2000, The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment and the Senses, 10.1215/9780822381372 · DOI
  38. Melbye, 2010, Landscape Allegory in Cinema: From Wilderness to Wasteland, 10.1057/9780230109797 · DOI
  39. Millet, 2006, Singapore Cinema
  40. 1997, Singapore: A Developmental City State
  41. Pow, 2010, Management of Success: Singapore Revisited, 400
  42. Rose, 2001, Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials
  43. Scott, 2005, On Hollywood
  44. Shiel, 2001, Cinema and the City: Film and Urban Society in the Global Context, 1, 10.1002/9780470712948 · DOI
  45. 2001, Cinema and the City: Film and Urban Society in the Global Context
  46. Siddique Harvey, 2007, Nomadic trajectories: mapping short film production in Singapore, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 8, 262, 10.1080/14649370701238730 · DOI
  47. Tan, 2001, ‘Civic society’ and the ‘new economy’ in patriarchal Singapore: emasculating the political, feminizing the public, Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 15, 95
  48. Tan, 2003, Sexing up Singapore, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 6, 403, 10.1177/136787790364002 · DOI
  49. Tan , S.K. Lee , M.H.H. Aw , A. 2003 Contemporary Singapore filmmaking: history, policies and Eric Khoo Jump Cut: A Review of Contemporary Media http://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/jc46.2003/12storeys/text.html
  50. Uhde, 2000, Latent Images: Film in Singapore
  51. Wee, 2007, The Asian Modern: Culture, Capitalist Development, Singapore, 10.5790/hongkong/9789622098596.001.0001 · DOI
  52. Wee, 2010, Management of Success: Singapore Revisited, 489, 10.1355/9789814279864-032 · DOI
  53. Wee, The suppressed in the modern urbanscape: recent film in Singapore, Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique
  54. Weiss, 2005, Who sets social policy in metropolis? Economic positioning and social reform in Singapore, New Political Science, 27, 267, 10.1080/07393140500220102 · DOI
  55. Wong, 2003, Quality of life of the elderly in Singapore's multi-racial society, International Journal of Social Economics, 30, 302, 10.1108/03068290310460170 · DOI
  56. Yeoh, 2004, Cosmopolitanism and its exclusions in Singapore, Urban Studies, 41, 2431, 10.1080/00420980412331297618 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
LAW, L., WEE, C. J. W.-L., & MCMULLAN, F.
Affiliations
  • James Cook University (AU)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
LAW, L.
Venue
Geographical Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-11
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
363-374
ISSN
  • 0004-9190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-5863
OpenAlex
W1501904213
Cited by
7
References
60
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geographical Research (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Spatial and Cultural Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema History and Criticism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema and Media Studies
Keywords
Singapore cinema, film and space, mise-en-scène, urban regeneration, global cities, developmental state, life course, age and gender, class, built environment, globalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review