The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long‐Term Performance of an In Situ “Iron Wall” for Remediation of VOCs
Abstract
The use of granular iron for in situ degradation of dissolved chlorinated organic compounds is rapidly gaining acceptance as a cost‐effective technology for ground water remediation. This paper describes the first field demonstration of the technology, and is of particular importance since it provides the longest available record of performance (five years). A mixture of 22% granular iron and 78% sand was installed as a permeable “wall” across the path of a contaminant plume at Canadian Forces Base, Borden, Ontario. The major contaminants were trichloroethene (TCE, 268 mg/L) and tetrachloroethene (PCE, 58 mg/L). Approximately 90% of the TCE and 86% of the PCE were removed by reductive dechlorination within the wall, with no measurable decrease in performance over the five year duration of the test. Though about 1% of the influent TCE and PCE appeared as dichloroethene isomers as a consequence of the dechlorination of TCE and PCE, these also degraded within the iron‐sand mixture. Performance of the field installation was reasonably consistent with the results of laboratory column studies conducted to simulate the field behavior. However, if a more reactive iron material, or a higher percentage of iron had been used, complete removal of the chlorinated compounds might have been achieved. Changes in water chemistry indicated that calcium carbonate was precipitating within the reactive material; however, the trace amount of precipitate detected in core samples collected four years after installation of the wall suggest that the observed performance should persist for at least another five years. The study provides strong evidence that in situ use of granular iron could provide a long‐term, low‐maintenance cost solution for many ground water contamination problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., & Teller, E. (1938) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01269a023 · Cited by 28,156
Cited by
Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: An overview
Zhang, W.-X. (2003) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025520116015 · Cited by 2,003
Biogeochemical Redox Processes and their Impact on Contaminant Dynamics
Borch, T., Kretzschmar, R., Kappler, A., Cappellen, P. V., Ginder-Vogel, M., Voegelin, A., & Campbell, K. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9026248 · Cited by 1,456
Nanoscale iron particles for complete reduction of chlorinated ethenes
Lien, H.-L., & Zhang, W.-X. (2001) · Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects · doi:10.1016/s0927-7757(01)00767-1 · Cited by 337
Vogan, J. L., Focht, R. M., Clark, D. K., & Graham, S. L. (1999) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00033-3 · Cited by 181
Nitrate removal rates in a 15-year-old permeable reactive barrier treating septic system nitrate
Robertson, W. D., Vogan, J. L., & Lombardo, P. S. (2008) · Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6592.2008.00205.x · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Hannesin, S. F., & Gillham, R. W.
- Venue
- Groundwater
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 164-170
- ISSN
- 0017-467X (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6584
- OpenAlex
- W1996053651
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐Term Performance of an In Situ “Iron Wall” for Remediation of VOCs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb01077.x
- The paper
- O'Hannesin, S. F., & Gillham, R. W. (1998). Long‐Term Performance of an In Situ “Iron Wall” for Remediation of VOCs. Groundwater. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb01077.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.