Cited by 13Groundwater flow and contamination studiesEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

In situ Mixing of Organic Matter Decreases Hydraulic Conductivity of Denitrification Walls in Sand Aquifers

Open access
Barkle, Gregory F., Schipper, Louis A., Burgess, Craig P., Painter, Brett D.M.·2008·Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation

Abstract

In a previous study, a denitrification wall was constructed in a sand aquifer using sawdust as the carbon substrate. Ground water bypassed around this sawdust wall due to reduced hydraulic conductivity. We investigated potential reasons for this by testing two new walls and conducting laboratory studies. The first wall was constructed by mixing aquifer material in situ without substrate addition to investigate the effects of the construction technique ( mixed wall ). A second, biochip wall , was constructed using coarse wood chips to determine the effect of size of the particles in the amendment on hydraulic conductivity. The aquifer hydraulic conductivity was 35.4 m/d, while in the mixed wall it was 2.8 m/d and in the biochip wall 3.4 m/d. This indicated that the mixing of the aquifer sands below the water table allowed the particles to re‐sort themselves into a matrix with a significantly lower hydraulic conductivity than the process that originally formed the aquifer. The addition of a coarser substrate in the biochip wall significantly increased total porosity and decreased bulk density, but hydraulic conductivity remained low compared to the aquifer. Laboratory cores of aquifer sand mixed under dry and wet conditions mimicked the reduction in hydraulic conductivity observed in the field within the mixed wall. The addition of sawdust to the laboratory cores resulted in a significantly higher hydraulic conductivity when mixed dry compared to cores mixed wet. This reduction in the hydraulic conductivity of the sand/sawdust cores mixed under saturated conditions repeated what occurred in the field in the original sawdust wall. This indicated that laboratory investigations can be a useful tool to highlight potential reductions in field hydraulic conductivities that may occur when differing materials are mixed under field conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2007.00185.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The flow of groundwater under the Cambridge wall may have been a result of mixing of saturated sands during construction, which caused a decline in aquifer hydraulic conductivity.

    “This may have been a result of mixing of saturated sands during construction of the denitrification wall which caused a decline in aquifer hydraulic conductivity (Barkle et al., 2008).”

    From Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall (2011) · cites this paper as Barkle et al., 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Ahuja, L.R., J.W. Naney, R.E. Green, and D.R. Nielsen. 1984. Macro-porosity to charactersize spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and effects of land management. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48, no. 4: 699-702.
  2. Ahuja, L.R., D.K. Cassel, R.R. Bruce, and B.B. Barnes. 1989. Evaluation of spatial distribution of hydraulic conductivity using effective porosity data. Soil Science Society of America Journal 148, no. 6: 404-411.
  3. Bear, J. 1972. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. New York: Elsevier.
  4. Calvin, C., I. Hilary, and G. Lorne. 2005. Barrier Systems for Environmental Contaminant Containment and Treatment. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. ISBN: 0849340403.
  5. Franzmeier, D.P. 1991. Estimation of hydraulic conductivity from effective porosity data for some Indiana soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55, no. 6: 1801-1803.
  6. Gavaskar, A.R., N. Gupta, B.M. Sass, R.J. Janosy, D. O'Sullivan. 1998. Permeable Barriers for Groundwater Remediation- Design, Construction, and Monitoring. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press. P176 ISBN: 1-57477-036-5.
  7. McLaren, R.G., and K.C. Cameron. 1990. Soil Science-An Intro- duction to the Properties and Management of New Zealand Soils. Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
  8. Suleiman A.A., and J.T. Ritchie. 2001. Estimating saturated hydraulic conductivity from soil porosity. Transactions of ASAE 44, no. 2: 235-239.
  9. Timlin D.J., L.R. Ahuja, Y. Pachepsky, R.D. Williams, D. Gime- nez, and W. Rawls. 1999. Use of Brooks-Corey parameters to improve estimates of saturated conductivity from effective porosity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63, no. 5: 1086-1092. Biographical Sketches

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barkle, G. F., Schipper, L. A., Burgess, C. P., & Painter, B. D. M.
Venue
Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
57-64
ISSN
  • 1069-3629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6592
OpenAlex
W2153534996
Cited by
13
References
2
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation (publishedVersion)
  • Research Commons (University of Waikato) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fonterra Co-Operative Group
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Keywords
hydraulic conductivity, sand aquifer, in-situ mixing, sawdust, wood chips, particle sorting, porosity, bulk density, groundwater remediation, nitrogen removal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review