The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Employing multiple theories and evoking new ideas: the use of clinical material.
Abstract
In this paper, I wish to illustrate how working with a patient who had a certain kind of narcissistic difficulty led me to develop particular clinical strategies to facilitate the development of a sturdier sense of self, greater affect tolerance and modulation, the diminution of harshness of her superego, and the ownership of projected parts of herself, and to decrease paranoid ideation. I call upon concepts from various theoretical schools of psychoanalysis to make sense of the dynamic intricacies of the patient's psychological organization as they revealed themselves in the analytic process. These conceptualizations of the patient's difficulties and of clinical interventions to address them result in a hybrid theory of both theory and technique. What transpired in the clinical work also led me to propose an additional way to understand this kind of patient's difficulties with accepting interpretations or any view that differed from the patient's subjectivity. I am proposing that 'otherness' itself, rather than only specific conflictual aspects of the self, is disowned. It is the analyst's empathic stance toward all that is repudiated--the specific disowned aspects of the self and 'otherness' itself--along with empathy for the patient's conscious state that will enable reinternalization and ultimately healing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Evidence suggested that the capacity for self-reflection and ability to think about someone else’s, sometimes called theory of mind or mind reading, are not the same thing but have reciprocal influence.”
From The dark side of empathy in narcissistic personality disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
In the citing paper
“Despite this, difficulties in one capacity predict difficulties in another (64).”
From The dark side of empathy in narcissistic personality disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
Citations
Cites
On the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis
Eizirik, C. L. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429481031-3 · Cited by 790
(1991) · PubMed · Cited by 570
Mentalization and the changing aims of child psychoanalysis
Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1998) · Psychoanalytic Dialogues · doi:10.1080/10481889809539235 · Cited by 422
Reflections on Some Relations Between Psychoanalytic Concepts and Psychoanalytic Practice
Sandler, J. (1987) · Current Issues in Psychoanalytic Practice · doi:10.1300/j256v03n01_03 · Cited by 216
Projective identification: the analyst’s involvement
Feldman, M. M. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429475788-12 · Cited by 115
Toward an Understanding of Unmentalized Experience
Mitrani, J. L. (1995) · The Psychoanalytic Quarterly · doi:10.1080/21674086.1995.11927444 · Cited by 79
The past unconscious, the present unconscious and the vicissitudes of guilt.
Sandler, J., & Sandler, A. (1987) · PubMed · Cited by 70
The aim of psychoanalysis in theory and in practice.
Steiner, J. F. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 49
Some developments from the work of Melanie Klein.
Eb, S. (1983) · PubMed · Cited by 42
Bolognini, S. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 40
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Bolognini S, 1997, Int J Psychoanal, 78, 279
- Feldman M, 1997, Int J Psychoanal, 78, 227
- Fonagy P, 1991, Int J Psychoanal, 72, 639
- Hamilton V, 1996, The analyst’s preconscious
- Kantrowitz JL, 2003, J Clin Psychoanal, 12, 151
- Kohut H, 1971, The analysis of the self
- Krystal H, 1974, Annu Psychoanal, 2, 98
- Loewald HW, 1960, Int J Psychoanal, 41, 6
- Sandler J, 1976, Int Rev Psychoanal, 3, 43
- Sandler J, 1983, Int J Psychoanal, 64, 35
- Sandler J, 1987, Int J Psychoanal, 68, 331
- Spillius EB, 1983, Int J Psychoanal, 64, 321
- Steiner J, 1996, Int J Psychoanal, 77, 1073
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The dark side of empathy in narcissistic personality disorder
di Giacomo, E., Andreini, E., Lorusso, O., & Clerici, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1074558 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Kantrowitz, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kantrowitz, Judy L.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Psychoanalysis
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 355-368
- ISSN
- 0020-7578 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-8315
- OpenAlex
- W2066816781
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The International Journal of Psychoanalysis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
- Keywords
- paranoid ideation, affect tolerance, affect modulation, self-ownership, clinical strategies
- MeSH terms
- Empathy, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Narcissism, Projection, Psychoanalytic Theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Employing multiple theories and evoking new ideas: the use of clinical material. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00039.x
- The paper
- Kantrowitz, J. L. (2008). Employing multiple theories and evoking new ideas: the use of clinical material. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00039.x