Cited by 5Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPsychology and Mental HealthPsychoanalysis and Social Critique

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Employing multiple theories and evoking new ideas: the use of clinical material.

Kantrowitz, Judy L.·2008·The International Journal of Psychoanalysis

Abstract

In this paper, I wish to illustrate how working with a patient who had a certain kind of narcissistic difficulty led me to develop particular clinical strategies to facilitate the development of a sturdier sense of self, greater affect tolerance and modulation, the diminution of harshness of her superego, and the ownership of projected parts of herself, and to decrease paranoid ideation. I call upon concepts from various theoretical schools of psychoanalysis to make sense of the dynamic intricacies of the patient's psychological organization as they revealed themselves in the analytic process. These conceptualizations of the patient's difficulties and of clinical interventions to address them result in a hybrid theory of both theory and technique. What transpired in the clinical work also led me to propose an additional way to understand this kind of patient's difficulties with accepting interpretations or any view that differed from the patient's subjectivity. I am proposing that 'otherness' itself, rather than only specific conflictual aspects of the self, is disowned. It is the analyst's empathic stance toward all that is repudiated--the specific disowned aspects of the self and 'otherness' itself--along with empathy for the patient's conscious state that will enable reinternalization and ultimately healing.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00039.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bolognini S, 1997, Int J Psychoanal, 78, 279
  2. Feldman M, 1997, Int J Psychoanal, 78, 227
  3. Fonagy P, 1991, Int J Psychoanal, 72, 639
  4. Hamilton V, 1996, The analyst’s preconscious
  5. Kantrowitz JL, 2003, J Clin Psychoanal, 12, 151
  6. Kohut H, 1971, The analysis of the self
  7. Krystal H, 1974, Annu Psychoanal, 2, 98
  8. Loewald HW, 1960, Int J Psychoanal, 41, 6
  9. Sandler J, 1976, Int Rev Psychoanal, 3, 43
  10. Sandler J, 1983, Int J Psychoanal, 64, 35
  11. Sandler J, 1987, Int J Psychoanal, 68, 331
  12. Spillius EB, 1983, Int J Psychoanal, 64, 321
  13. Steiner J, 1996, Int J Psychoanal, 77, 1073

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Kantrowitz, J. L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kantrowitz, Judy L.
Venue
The International Journal of Psychoanalysis
Published
2008-04
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
355-368
ISSN
  • 0020-7578 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-8315
OpenAlex
W2066816781
Cited by
5
References
14
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Psychoanalysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
Keywords
paranoid ideation, affect tolerance, affect modulation, self-ownership, clinical strategies
MeSH terms
Empathy, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Narcissism, Projection, Psychoanalytic Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Employing multiple theories and evoking new ideas: the use of clinical material. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00039.x
The paper
Kantrowitz, J. L. (2008). Employing multiple theories and evoking new ideas: the use of clinical material. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00039.x