The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MORE ON DEMEANOR AND ARREST IN DADE COUNTY*
Abstract
A recent study of police behavior using data collected in Dade County, Florida, found that citizen demeanor is a spurious correlate of arrest in light of control for criminal conduct (Klinger, 1994). This finding calls into question the long‐standing belief that hostility directly increases the odds of arrest in police‐citizen encounters. Responding to this research, Lundman (1994) reanalyzed data used in several previous studies that had reported hostility effects. His reanalysis offered limited support for a demeanor‐arrest link. Because the measures of demeanor he used and the models he estimated were somewhat different from those Klinger had used and estimated, Lundman suggested that it would be valuable to revisit the Dade County data to see whether Klinger's null finding regarding hostility effects might be artifactual. This study reanalyzes the Dade County data. It indicates that one of four measures of demeanor is a significant net correlate of arrest under some circumstances. The implications of this finding are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Police decisions can be affected by a suspect's demeanor.
“demeanor (Engel, Sobol, & Worden, 2000;Klinger, 1996;Lundman, 1996;Worden & Shepard, 1996)”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Klinger, 1996
Citations
Cites
Fox, J. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412985604 · Cited by 1,008
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.4135/9781412984744 · DOI
- Becker Howard, 1963, Outsiders
- 10.2307/1227728 · DOI
- Black Donald, 1976, The Behavior of Law
- Black Donald, 1980, The Manners and Customs of the Police
- 10.2307/2093853 · DOI
- 10.2307/3033920 · DOI
- Felson Richard B., 1993, Routine Activity and Rational Choice
- Felson Richard B., 1984, Age and the effect of third parties during criminal violence, Sociology and Social Research, 68, 52
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01162.x · DOI
- Lundman Richard J., 1974, Routine police arrest practices: A commonweal perspective, Social Problems, 22, 127, 10.2307/799572 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01168.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002242787801500107 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1995.tb01189.x · DOI
- Pastor Paul A., 1978, Mobilization in public drunkenness control: A comparison of legal and medical approaches, Social Problems, 25, 373, 10.2307/800490 · DOI
- 10.1086/223794 · DOI
- Quinney Richard, 1970, The Social Reality of Crime
- Reiss, 1971, The Police and the Public
- Sellin Thorsten, 1964, The Measurement of Delinquency
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1984.tb00286.x · DOI
- 10.1086/449126 · DOI
- 10.2307/2578527 · DOI
- Smith Douglas A., 1983, Evaluating Performance in Criminal Justice Agencies
- 10.2307/800391 · DOI
- 10.2307/800422 · DOI
- 10.2307/1143211 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/226109 · DOI · Paper page
- Sykes Richard E., 1976, The Ambivalent Force: Perspectives on the Police
- Visher Christy A., 1983, Gender, police arrest decisions, and notions of chivalry, Criminology, 215
- 10.2307/3053852 · DOI
- 10.2307/3053482 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gau, J. M., & Brunson, R. K. (2010) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418820902763889 · Cited by 582
POLICE DISRESPECT TOWARD THE PUBLIC: AN ENCOUNTER‐BASED ANALYSIS*
MASTROFSKI, S. D., REISIG, M. D., & McCLUSKEY, J. D. (2002) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00965.x · Cited by 317
Mirage of Police Reform: Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy
University at Albany, S., Worden, R. E., McLean, S. J., & John F. Finn Institute for Public Safety, U. (2017) · Luminos · doi:10.1525/luminos.30 · Cited by 141
Nix, J., Pickett, J. T., & Mitchell, R. J. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-019-09363-4 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- KLINGER, D. A.
- Venue
- Criminology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-82
- ISSN
- 0011-1384
- 1745-9125
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review