Cited by 154Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisRestraint-Related Deaths

TOWARD A NATIONAL ESTIMATE OF POLICE USE OF NONLETHAL FORCE*

Open access
HICKMAN, MATTHEW J., PIQUERO, ALEX R., GARNER, JOEL H.·2008·Criminology & Public Policy

Abstract

Research Summary Despite frequent calls for national data on police use of force, the literature is dominated by unrepresentative samples from a small number of primarily urban jurisdictions, inconsistent definitions of force, and differing universes for the computation of rates. Among 36 publications that report on the amount of nonlethal force used by the police, rates vary from 0.1% to 31.8%. To improve our ability to estimate the amount of nonlethal force in the United States, we employ data from two sources: the Police‐Public Contact Survey (PPCS) and the Survey of Inmates in Local Jails (SILJ). Using comparable measures from these surveys, we estimate that the police use or threaten to use force in 1.7% of all contacts and in 20.0% of all arrests. The PPCS accounts for 87% of the total force incidents derived from both surveys. Males, youths, and racial minorities report greater rates of police use of force, but multivariate models highlight the role of potentially provoking behaviors on the likelihood and severity of force. Policy Implications Improved estimates from the combined PPCS‐SILJ samples support the proposition that police use force infrequently and at the lower end of the severity scale. Reported amounts of force vary based on respondent race, sex, and age, but greater variation in police use of force is explained by suspect behavior. The combined PPCS‐SILJ sample provides a more representative basis for estimating the rate and correlates of nonlethal force. State and local estimates from less representative samples can be interpreted in light of these findings. National estimates could be improved by devoting sufficient resources to support the collection of agency records of both lethal and nonlethal force.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2008.00528.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HICKMAN, M. J., PIQUERO, A. R., & GARNER, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Seattle University (US)
  • Maryland Population Research Center (US)
Venue
Criminology & Public Policy
Published
2008-11
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
563-604
ISSN
  • 1538-6473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9133
OpenAlex
W1988950324
Cited by
154
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
27.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Criminology & Public Policy (publishedVersion)
Funders
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Restraint-Related Deaths
Keywords
police use of force, arrests, national estimates, gender and age differences, suspect behavior, police records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review