TOWARD A NATIONAL ESTIMATE OF POLICE USE OF NONLETHAL FORCE*
Open accessAbstract
Research Summary Despite frequent calls for national data on police use of force, the literature is dominated by unrepresentative samples from a small number of primarily urban jurisdictions, inconsistent definitions of force, and differing universes for the computation of rates. Among 36 publications that report on the amount of nonlethal force used by the police, rates vary from 0.1% to 31.8%. To improve our ability to estimate the amount of nonlethal force in the United States, we employ data from two sources: the Police‐Public Contact Survey (PPCS) and the Survey of Inmates in Local Jails (SILJ). Using comparable measures from these surveys, we estimate that the police use or threaten to use force in 1.7% of all contacts and in 20.0% of all arrests. The PPCS accounts for 87% of the total force incidents derived from both surveys. Males, youths, and racial minorities report greater rates of police use of force, but multivariate models highlight the role of potentially provoking behaviors on the likelihood and severity of force. Policy Implications Improved estimates from the combined PPCS‐SILJ samples support the proposition that police use force infrequently and at the lower end of the severity scale. Reported amounts of force vary based on respondent race, sex, and age, but greater variation in police use of force is explained by suspect behavior. The combined PPCS‐SILJ sample provides a more representative basis for estimating the rate and correlates of nonlethal force. State and local estimates from less representative samples can be interpreted in light of these findings. National estimates could be improved by devoting sufficient resources to support the collection of agency records of both lethal and nonlethal force.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The amount of 'force' necessary in a given situation is subjective, primarily self-reported, and heavily underreported.
“the amount of B force ^ necessary in a given situation is subjective, primarily self-reported, and heavily underreported (Hickman et al. 2008).”
From Report: increases in police use of force in the presence of body-worn cameras are driven by officer discretion: a protocol-based subgroup analysis of ten randomized experiments (2016) · cites this paper as Hickman et al. 2008
There is no tracking system of police force that is completely reliable or even valid.
“There is no tracking system of police force that is completely reliable or even valid -since the amount of B force ^ necessary in a given situation is subjective, primarily self-reported, and heavily underreported (Hickman et al. 2008).”
From Report: increases in police use of force in the presence of body-worn cameras are driven by officer discretion: a protocol-based subgroup analysis of ten randomized experiments (2016) · cites this paper as Hickman et al. 2008
Cites
Compliance on Demand: The Public's Response to Specific Police Requests
MASTROFSKI, S. D., SNIPES, J. B., & SUPINA, A. E. (1996) · Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0022427896033003001 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ariel, B., Farrar, W. A., & Sutherland, A. (2015) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-014-9236-3 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., Megicks, S., & Henderson, R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-016-9261-3 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
“There is no tracking system of police force that is completely reliable or even valid—since the amount of Bforce^ necessary in a given situation is subjective, primarily self-reported, and heavily underreported (Hickman et al. 2008).”
BackgroundEngel, R. S., Corsaro, N., Isaza, G. T., & McManus, H. D. (2022) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12574 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
“First, use of force incidents are far more likely for arrestee populations (Davis et al., 2018; Garner et al., 2018; Hickman et al., 2008); that is, situations involving arrest have a higher prevalence of use of force than any other type of police–citizen contact.”
- Authors
- HICKMAN, M. J., PIQUERO, A. R., & GARNER, J. H.
- Affiliations
- Seattle University (US)
- Maryland Population Research Center (US)
- Venue
- Criminology & Public Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 563-604
- ISSN
- 1538-6473 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-9133
- OpenAlex
- W1988950324
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 27.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Criminology & Public Policy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Restraint-Related Deaths
- Keywords
- police use of force, arrests, national estimates, gender and age differences, suspect behavior, police records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review